The Samguk yusa (Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms) recorded that the history of the Old Choson began as the Tan’gun Choson and was succeeded by the Kija (Jizi) Choson. It quoted the Chinese historical document of the Weishu and mentioned specifically the capital and dates of Tan’gun. These records are very important and credible, but there are still some tendencies to discredit them because of confusion with the records of the Kogi (Old Records). The Weishu, probably compiled around the 3rd century CE, stated that Tan’gun established Asadal as his capital two thousand years before, and we can date the Tan’gun Choson perhaps to the 17th century BCE. This was the time when a new leader recorded in Korean historical documents first appeared.
As Kija did not go east to Korea, today the history of the Kija Choson has been negated. I label the period of Kija Choson as the Yemaek Choson because that was the time when the Yemaek people, a branch of Korean nation, were active. Thus, while the term “Old Choson” may still be employed to refer to the entire ancient period, it can not properlyrepresent specific historical stage. It is more appropriate to state explicitly “Tan’gun” and “Tan’gun Choson.” If we use the term “Old Choson” while denying the existence of the Kija Choson, it will merely shorten the history of the Old Choson and create more confusion.
The Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger has been considered as the representative relicof the culture of the Old Choson. This relic has been found in the area stretching from the Inner Mongolia to the southern shores of the Korean Peninsula and the date goes back to the 10th century BCE. However, as scholars have made too close a connection between the cultures of the Old Choson and the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger, some have come to asserta mistaken notion that the history of the Old Choson began around the 10th century BCE. The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger represents the culture of the Yemaek Choson. Since Tan’gun Choson predates the Yemaek Choson, we need to search for other relics that can show the cultural stages of the Tan’gun Choson. Thus, it is preferable to use the terms “Tan’gun Choson” and “Yemaek Choson” instead of an ambiguous expression of the “Old Choson.” The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger can represent the cultural stage only if we can place it in the proper historical stage.
Ⅰ. 『三國遺事』의 檀君기사와 年代 문제
Ⅱ. 琵琶形銅劍의 문제
이 논문과 함께 다운받은 논문
- 발행기관 : 고조선단군학회
- 자료유형 : 전자저널 논문
- 등재정보 : KCI 등재
- 작성언어 : 한국어
- 파일형식 : PDF
URL : http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/498397
고고학으로 본 고조선
송호정, 일조각, 한국사 시민강좌 49, 2011, 1-20
遼東과 韓半島 靑銅器文化의 變遷과 相互交流
李淸圭, 한국고대사학회, 한국고대사연구 63, 2011, 227-268
古朝鮮의 位置와 中心地 문제에 대한 고찰
송호정, 한국고대사학회, 한국고대사연구 58, 2010, 19-60
고조선의 도읍 위치와 그 이동
윤내현, 고조선단군학회, 고조선단군학 (7), 2002, 207-238
국어와 영어에서 모음길이의 음성/음운학적 성격과 그 표기방식에 대하여
유만근, 한국어문교육연구회, 어문연구 19(1), 1991, 146-148
누리미디어에서 제공되는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, 누리미디어는 각 저작물의 내용을 보증하거나 책임을 지지 않습니다. 단, 누리미디어에서 제공되는 서지정보는 저작권법에 의해 보호를 받는 저작물로, 사전 허락 없이 임의로 대량 수집하거나 프로그램에 의한 주기적 수집 이용, 무단 전재, 배포하는 것을 금하며, 이를 위반할 경우, 저작권법 및 관련법령에 따라 민, 형사상의 책임을 질 수 있습니다.