Taiwan was built over Japanese Empire defeat and the Chinese national governmental(中國 國民政府) jurisdiction. The Chinese national government concentrated a national strength on Kuokong neichan(國共內戰) in Chinese mainland me and excluded several and a maintenance of public security in priority order to a station. Japan used Chinese national governmental policy in order to keep Japanese Empire infrastructure and attempted profit of oneself.
The Chinese national government dealt with the Koreans whom there was according to 'Han-Kyo Policy'(韓僑政策). The Chinese national government partitioned off a Korean with 'HanJeokByeongSa'(韓籍兵士) with the non-official civilian and applied to them 「韓僑韓俘處理辦法」, 「韓僑處理暫行辦法」. Basic position issued rights of residence certificate according to a mind of a Korean or it was to let you return, but generally resulted in a form of compulsory 'group repatriation'.
To the Korean repatriation was performed mainly in a station in 1946. This study can know that the repatriation of the results that synthesized statistics of Taiwan and Japan related organization, Korean soldier about 1,300 people and general Korean 2,000 people was put on progress of.
The Taiwan defend Command(臺灣警備司令部) concentrat the Korean soldiers who were a Japanese army, and managed 'HanJeokGwanByeong-JipHunChongDae‘(韓籍官兵集訓總隊) with an organization from November in 1945. The 'JipHunChongDae’(集訓總隊) was a worker group with a laborer, a civilian attached to the military civilian employee with a Korean soldier pulled before liberation to Taiwan and neighborhood region. As for them, it was concentrated in the Tai-Pei city neighborhood. it was transferred to 'GwangBokGun'(光復軍) 'JamPyeonJiDae(暫篇支隊)' of Korean Provisional Government after it was managed concentration according to policy of in the immediate liberation the China nationalist party(中國 國民黨) political power. Korean soldiers in Taiwan were built besides influence of a Korean Provisional Government unlike this, and a Chinese army surgeon was subject to. 'JipHunChongDae'(集訓總隊) trained ‘the friendly influence to China’, and it was for it to have been enforced rights and interests in a keynote of policy about Korea which was security' one in the Korean peninsula. The repatriation of 'JipHunChongDae(集訓總隊)' repeated an extension by an America's slow up work and was performed over two order in March 1946. Because it was played a check, as for the U. S. armed forces having let you delay their repatriation, it is determined this Chinese intention.
While it was keen Kuokong neichan(國共內戰), the Chinese national government limited a movement in China of a Korean through 'HanGyoIpGyeongCheoRiPanBeop‘(韓僑入境處理瓣法). The return of the Korean who blew on a a province of Taiwanese established in April in 1947 devoted itself to the middle that generally finishing became, residential investigation of a Korean and ’GeoRyuJeung‘(居留證) issue. The Chinese national government did issue condition of GeoRyuJeung on the Korean who flowed to Taiwan strictly. And They adhered to an attitude to let you call back Koreans immediately if self-condition was not enough. This is interpreted as by having been measures to secure Taiwanese public security.
The Taiwanese Korean Association(臺灣韓僑協會) took charge of role in the situation that the back coin delegation which reported identity of a Korean to the government of Taiwan nature wealth after examining guarantee and a residence situation was not installed in to a semi-national organization and went out. It was the middle, the 400 that a lot of Koreans returned to, and a large percentagen Korean looked up new life by local settlement and went out. The Taiwanese Korean Association exhausted role as a self-government enemy representative organization of a local Korean till a state religion between Korea and Chinas was established.
1. 머리말2. 중국 국민정부의 대만 수복과 일본인 송환3. 해방 직후 한인 사회와 귀환 실상4. ‘대만성정부’의 수립과 ‘대만한교협회’의 설립5. 맺음말Abstract
, 중국 국민정부
, the Chinese national governmental(中國 國民政府)
, Kuokong neichan(國共內戰)
, 'Han-Kyo Policy'(韓僑政策)
, A Taiwanese Korean
, The Taiwanese Korean Association(臺灣韓僑協會)
이 논문과 함께 다운받은 논문
- 발행기관 : 한국근현대사학회
- 자료유형 : 전자저널 논문
- 등재정보 : KCI등재
- 작성언어 : 한국어
- 파일형식 : TextPDF
URL : http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE00708550
일제강점기 조선과 대만의 영화검열 비교 연구
문한별, 엄진주, 우리문학회, 우리문학연구 47, 2015, 221-247
조선문학가동맹과 북조선문학예술총동맹의 대립과 그 원인, 1945~1953
배개화, 한국현대문학회, 한국현대문학연구 44, 2014, 347-381
“Colony, Empire, and De-colonization” in Taiwanese Film History
Misawa Mamie, 고려대학교 한국사연구소, International Journal of Korean History 19(2), 2014, 35-70
북한의 환경보호 현황과 개선 방안
정은찬, 남북문화예술학회, 남북문화예술연구 , 2014, 267-304
선군시대 북한 문학에 형상된 주도적 감성
임옥규, 남북문화예술학회, 남북문화예술연구 , 2014, 243-266
북한 가야금 `농현`에 대한 연구
백휘진, 한국퉁소연구회, 한국악기학 (10), 2013, 339-362
2012년 북한의 음악공연과 樂
배인교, 남북문화예술학회, 남북문화예술연구 , 2013, 283-310
남 · 북한 통일을 대비한 오르프 교수법에 기반한 국악교육 방안 탐색
김유라, 박창언, 남북문화예술학회, 남북문화예술연구 , 2013, 255-281
식민지 ‘문명화’의 격차와 그 함의
문명기, 고려대학교 한국학연구소, 한국학연구 46, 2013, 33-69
일제강점기 대만지역 한인사회와 강제연행
黃善翌, 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소, 한국독립운동사연구 24, 2005, 393-422
누리미디어에서 제공되는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, 누리미디어는 각 저작물의 내용을 보증하거나 책임을 지지 않습니다. 단, 누리미디어에서 제공되는 서지정보는 저작권법에 의해 보호를 받는 저작물로, 사전 허락 없이 임의로 대량 수집하거나 프로그램에 의한 주기적 수집 이용, 무단 전재, 배포하는 것을 금하며, 이를 위반할 경우, 저작권법 및 관련법령에 따라 민, 형사상의 책임을 질 수 있습니다.