도움말

중종대(中宗代) 사대인식(事大認識)의 변화

- 대례의(大禮議)에 대한 별행(別行) 파견 논의를 중심으로

Changes regarding ‘Perception of Sadae’(事大認識) that became apparent during the reign of King Jungjong - Examination of Discussions over the issue of dispatching a special envoy(別行) about the Grand ceremony(大禮議) in Ming(明) dynasty’s court
역사와 현실 제62호, 2006.12, 345-376 (32 pages)
인용정보 복사
Quick View Quick View
구매하기 6,000원
인용하기
이용수 : 305건
피인용수 : 0건
분야내 활용도 : 18%
자세히 보기 >

· 이용수 : 2010년부터 집계한 원문다운로드수

· 피인용수 : DBpia 논문 가운데 해당 논문을 인용한 논문수

· 분야내 활용도 : 최근 24개월간 DBpia 이용수를 기준으로 산출 / 0%에 가까울 수록 활용도가 높고, 100%에 가까울 수록 활용도가 낮음

초록
The objective set in this article, is to inspect how the discussions continued over the issue of dispatching an envoy to the Grand Ceremony(大禮議) of the Ming dynasty court(which has been considered as an important event that happened during the middle period of the Ming dynasty), and to examine what was the government officials' general perception of Joseon's Sadae(事大) in the 16th century. The question that should be addressed, is with what kind of values and standards that they proceeded with diplomatic functions and negotiations. Results of such examination revealed the fact that a new perception of the concept of Sadae(事大) centered on the Daegan(臺諫) officials was emerging at the time.
The concept of Sadae(事大) usually referred to a relationship in which the smaller country(小國) expressed goodwill and friendship by dispatching envoys to the bigger country(大國), maintaining diplomatic communications and also the norm of international order surrounding them. Yet the Daegan(臺諫) officials perceived the concept of Sadae(事大) as more of a moral courtesy based upon the teachings of classic texts. So they started to argue that before dispatching an envoy to a diplomatic function arranged by the Chinese government, the nature of such function or other related events must be ascertained, and envoys should be dispatched only when the nature of such function or the surrounding environment was proved legitimate and justified. At the same time, the ethics determining the relationship between King and the vassals started to recognize the concept of justice(義) more importantly than the order of the King, and this kind of ethic made them believe that the Joseon government, as a vassal, should be able to criticize and actively provide suggestions to China, the 'King' country, in the name of Justice. Surely in reality, the officials could not appeal directly to the Emperor of the Ming dynasty, but at least they maintained their position of not allowing envoy dispatches that were not justified.
This kind of attitude toward the concept of Sadae(事大) was related to the notion of 'The Debt that Joseon owed to Ming, for rescuing Joseon at Japanese invation of Korea in 1592'〔the so-called, Jaejo-ji-eun(再造之恩) sentiment〕. The argument that one should pay respect to the Chinese court only when the nature of a diplomatic function was justified, and not pay respect when it is not justified, was an argument where values were imposed upon diplomatic relationships. This argument was strongly in favor of 'paying debts', and not forgetting that someone helped them. Even when the national crises arisen by the war with the Japanese were over, the aforementioned 'Debt-paying' sentiment remained strongly among many Joseon officials, and the reason it maintained its influences for such a long time was because it was based upon a strong perception toward the concept of 'Sadae' which unlike before maintained the issue of justice as a priority. The 16th century was a time period when the perception of Sadae(事大) came to be firmly based upon the issue of justice. And this perception was put in a conflicting position(拮抗) with other practical opinions viewing the foreign situations. It was a transitional period, in terms of the diplomatic meaning of the Joseon dynasty's relationship with Ming dynasty.

목차
머리말
1. 대례의(大禮議)와 그에 대한 별행파견 논의
2. 중종대 사대인식(事大認識)의 분화
맺음말
Abstract
키워드

논문의 주요 키워드를 제공합니다. 키워드를 클릭하여 관련 논문을 확인해 보세요!

참고문헌 (0)

현재 논문의 참고문헌을 찾아 신청해주세요!

해당 논문은 참고문헌 정보가 없습니다.

인용된 논문 (0)

알림서비스 신청하고 '인용된 논문' 정보를 메일로 확인 하세요!

해당 논문은 인용된 논문 정보가 없습니다.

제 1 저자의 다른 논문 (10)

구도영 식별저자 저자의 상세정보를 확인해 보세요.

권호 내 다른 논문 (16)
  • 처음
  •  
  • 이전
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 다음
  •  
  • 마지막
추천 논문 (10)

DBpia 추천논문과 함께 다운받은 논문을 제공합니다. 논문 초록의 텍스트마이닝과 이용 및 인용 관계 분석을 통해 추천해 드리는 연관논문을 확인해보세요.

DBpia 추천논문

더 많은 추천논문을 확인해 보세요!

함께 다운받은 논문

지표

이용현황

· 이용수

· 이용순위 상위 Top3

자세히 보기 >
No 상위 이용이관 이용수
1 서울대학교 38
2 고려대학교 21
3 경희대학교 20

활용도

· 활용지수

· 논문의 활용도 추이 (주제분야 기준)

자세히 보기 >

: %

2016-09
2016-10
2016-11
2016-12
0
20
40
60
80
100
  • 0%
  • 20%
  • 40%
  • 60%
  • 80%
  • 100%

피인용수

상세정보
저작권 정책

누리미디어에서 제공되는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, 누리미디어는 각 저작물의 내용을 보증하거나 책임을 지지 않습니다. 단, 누리미디어에서 제공되는 서지정보는 저작권법에 의해 보호를 받는 저작물로, 사전 허락 없이 임의로 대량 수집하거나 프로그램에 의한 주기적 수집 이용, 무단 전재, 배포하는 것을 금하며, 이를 위반할 경우, 저작권법 및 관련법령에 따라 민, 형사상의 책임을 질 수 있습니다.

맨 위로 이동