도움말

미술사의 사진에 관한 화두

- 사진의 정체성과 예술성에 관한 논의

Issues on Photography in Art History : Debates on Photographic Identity in Relation to ‘Art’
미술사연구 제20호, 2006.12, 311-342 (32 pages)
인용정보 복사
Quick View Quick View
구매하기 6,000원
인용하기
이용수 : 1,808건
피인용수 : 1건
분야내 활용도 : 1%
자세히 보기 >

· 이용수 : 2010년부터 집계한 원문다운로드수

· 피인용수 : DBpia 논문 가운데 해당 논문을 인용한 논문수

· 분야내 활용도 : 최근 24개월간 DBpia 이용수를 기준으로 산출 / 0%에 가까울 수록 활용도가 높고, 100%에 가까울 수록 활용도가 낮음

초록
Discussion on the photographic identity in relation to ‘art’ has been carried on since the 1830s when photography had first appeared in the history of art. What was at issue has been whether one could recognize the innate quality of photographic medium in terms of art in its conventional meaning. The debate was most controversial in the late 19th century.
What was certain seems to be that photography’s mechanical medium was not considered as an artful device at all at that time. Thus one sees ‘pictorialism’ formed in the circle of photography in order to follow ways of representing and visual mechanism of painting. However, such attempt to repress and even negate its identity was rather limited and couldn’t be a fundamental solution to the problematic aspect of photographic identity as art.
Such a word of ‘problem’ turned out to be a quite wrong word when it comes to the 20th century. From about 1903 when pure photography(or straight photography) movement aroused by Stieglitz, the way of considering photographic medium has been changed into a positive direction for photography itself. Not pretending to be other than itself, photography was able to assert its own identity as it is, which was quite liberating.
About liberation was, in fact, much more in painting’s side. Free from the burden of realistic representation of objects, painting developed into the grand period of abstraction, especially launched by Cubism and other non-figurative movements afterwards. In Modernism, painting and photography seem happily separated, pursuing their own way of art-making on the basis of their different mediums.
However, from Postmodern era in art, particularly from the late 1970s, the relation between painting and photography has been dramatically changed. There has been a strong force emerging from the postmodern art itself to unite the two. Art historical discourse including painting, of course, has actively invited photography to its mainstream, to its very centre. Two major points in photographic mechanism that contemporary art highlights and pinpoints were index and reproduction. These have been adopted to other forms of art such as painting in the last three decades. It can be said that what is regarded as postmodern aesthetics has found its characteristics in photography. Thus this essay in its second part explores indexical quality and reproductive mechanism in photography in terms of postmodern perspective.
It is ironical that such crucial qualities in photographic identity had been disregarded and even despised when photography was discussed in relation to art. Not only in the 19th century but also in the period of Modernism, the reproductive mechanism of photography, for example, was considered against art. Walter Benjamin’s concept of ‘aura’ ignites the debate on the relation between the original and its reproduction. All these arguments, still going on, are about how we conceive ‘art.’ That means that photography has become ‘art’ and ‘non-art’ depending what are the values emphasized in art historical discourse. In this respect, looking back at photography’s history, it seems like that one looks at art history’s moving photography-if there is such a thing, showing how it changes its signifying system.

목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 사진의 등장: 사진의 예술성에 대한 논의
Ⅲ. 포스트모던 미술과 사진: 포스트모던 미술사의 쟁점
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드

논문의 주요 키워드를 제공합니다. 키워드를 클릭하여 관련 논문을 확인해 보세요!

참고문헌 (0)

현재 논문의 참고문헌을 찾아 신청해주세요!

해당 논문은 참고문헌 정보가 없습니다.

인용된 논문 (1)

알림서비스 신청하고 '인용된 논문' 정보를 메일로 확인 하세요!

제 1 저자의 다른 논문 (30)

全英柏 식별저자 저자의 상세정보를 확인해 보세요.

  • 처음
  •  
  • 이전
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 다음
  •  
  • 마지막
권호 내 다른 논문 (15)

미술사연구 제20호 의 상세정보를 확인해 보세요.

  • 처음
  •  
  • 이전
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 다음
  •  
  • 마지막
추천 논문 (10)

DBpia 추천논문과 함께 다운받은 논문을 제공합니다. 논문 초록의 텍스트마이닝과 이용 및 인용 관계 분석을 통해 추천해 드리는 연관논문을 확인해보세요.

DBpia 추천논문

더 많은 추천논문을 확인해 보세요!

함께 다운받은 논문

지표

이용현황

· 이용수

· 이용순위 상위 Top3

자세히 보기 >
No 상위 이용이관 이용수
1 홍익대학교 821
2 서울대학교 144
3 이화여자대학교 71

활용도

· 활용지수

· 논문의 활용도 추이 (주제분야 기준)

자세히 보기 >

: %

2016-09
2016-10
2016-11
2016-12
0
20
40
60
80
100
  • 0%
  • 20%
  • 40%
  • 60%
  • 80%
  • 100%

피인용수

검색결과 미리보기

검색결과 목록을 보시려면 여기를 클릭하세요!

상세정보
저작권 정책

누리미디어에서 제공되는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, 누리미디어는 각 저작물의 내용을 보증하거나 책임을 지지 않습니다. 단, 누리미디어에서 제공되는 서지정보는 저작권법에 의해 보호를 받는 저작물로, 사전 허락 없이 임의로 대량 수집하거나 프로그램에 의한 주기적 수집 이용, 무단 전재, 배포하는 것을 금하며, 이를 위반할 경우, 저작권법 및 관련법령에 따라 민, 형사상의 책임을 질 수 있습니다.

맨 위로 이동