지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This dissertation is historical Studies Korean Critical literature. The a term criticism on civilzation in only one Peculiar criticism the middle duty, the modern Criticism and Classical Criticism. As a term criticism on civilization Several Sourace theory Saw “a Preface and an epilogue Criticism in a new―Style fiction”, “talk on Poetry in Chun Hee Dang Criticism”, “in Hak Ji Kwang Criticism”, “in Sin Mun Kjej Criticism” Although I have so far described and malyzed the a term Criticim on Civilization rathan than appraised it. I will now Summarize Same of the important Points and Proced to an assemssment.
As a Preface and an opilogue Criticsm express get through ligerature Critical a new－Style fiction ; first, was put a purpose or untility novel enlightenment and guide properly ; Secondly, fused to recognize toward a fiction or realism ; third, Conquer dialectic transcendence an ancient novel view porint. As talk on Poetry in Chun Hee Dang Criticism, the social function of literary is emphasis utility. He is a word, a Setence, a Sound critical method. As in Hak Ji Kwang Criticism look around, and An Hawk. In “The meaning of literature” Choi Doo Seon Performs a double task : first, he finst researches as to the literature a term criticism on Civilization. An Hwak’s “Korean literature” Come in contact with that modern a gate critical literature. He was ultimately asserted the authonomy of the literature. Last but not least, Paek Dae Jin asserted major the tend of thought Korean literature. He was asserted that the begining naturalism Korean literature. Although Some of these activies in practice tend to merger or overlap. But curiously enought, literary history has been so preoccupied with the setting of a work of literature that have been slight in comparison with the enormous efforts expended on the study of environment.
In short, there are still mysteries to be plumbed about how literature is born, about how it works, and how we react to it. it is with these matters that the critic concerns himself. we have now arrived that, a term criticism on civilization Peculior Criticism, it is in Practice among the most warious and eclectic of criticism. We want, at last, a critical history of literature that is both broad and deep.
As a Preface and an opilogue Criticsm express get through ligerature Critical a new－Style fiction ; first, was put a purpose or untility novel enlightenment and guide properly ; Secondly, fused to recognize toward a fiction or realism ; third, Conquer dialectic transcendence an ancient novel view porint. As talk on Poetry in Chun Hee Dang Criticism, the social function of literary is emphasis utility. He is a word, a Setence, a Sound critical method. As in Hak Ji Kwang Criticism look around, and An Hawk. In “The meaning of literature” Choi Doo Seon Performs a double task : first, he finst researches as to the literature a term criticism on Civilization. An Hwak’s “Korean literature” Come in contact with that modern a gate critical literature. He was ultimately asserted the authonomy of the literature. Last but not least, Paek Dae Jin asserted major the tend of thought Korean literature. He was asserted that the begining naturalism Korean literature. Although Some of these activies in practice tend to merger or overlap. But curiously enought, literary history has been so preoccupied with the setting of a work of literature that have been slight in comparison with the enormous efforts expended on the study of environment.
In short, there are still mysteries to be plumbed about how literature is born, about how it works, and how we react to it. it is with these matters that the critic concerns himself. we have now arrived that, a term criticism on civilization Peculior Criticism, it is in Practice among the most warious and eclectic of criticism. We want, at last, a critical history of literature that is both broad and deep.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 韓國開化期批評의 樣相
Ⅲ. 結論
참고문
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Methods of Criticism
Korea Journal
1980 .05
-
창조적 비평 연구
우리말글
2003 .04
-
1920년대 계급주의 아동문학 비평 연구 : 소년문예운동 방향전환론의 전개와 비평사적 의미
아동청소년문학연구
2008 .12
-
Trends in Criticism
Korea Journal
1979 .09
-
Footprints of Art Criticism in Korea : From Absence of Criticism to Ideological Criticism
Korea Journal
1986 .01
-
1960년대 신세대 비평가의 등장과 참여문학론-「 비평작업」의 비평사적 의의
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
History of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .07
-
김현의 비평과 『문학과지성』의 형성과정
비평문학
2007 .12
-
한국 대중문학론의 확대와 심화 : 1976년~1980년 비평을 중심으로
우리문학연구
2014 .01
-
Some Characteristics of Chinese Literary Criticism
동아문화
1981 .08
-
동서양 문학비평 담론의 차이에 대한 고찰 : 李奎報의 詩論을 中心으로
아시아문화연구
2006 .02
-
조연현 비평 연구 －평론집 『文學과 思想』을 중심으로－
국어국문학
2004 .05
-
N. 프라이 비평이 한국문예비평에 미친 영향
한국문학논총
2003 .01
-
On the Criticism of Confucianism in Korea
Korea Journal
1967 .09
-
아동문학 비평 논쟁의 초두(初頭), 그 도정(道程)과 의미 －？소금쟁이？ 번역？표절 논쟁
문학교육학
2007 .01
-
1950~60년대 신비평의 수용과 새로운 비평의 모색
한국근대문학연구
2004 .04
-
Trends and Tasks of the Study of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1982 .10
-
전후비평의 타자화와 폐쇄적 권력지향성
한국문학논총
2004 .01
-
임화의 비평론 연구
우리말글
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017687328