메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제44권 제2호
발행연도
2002.11
수록면
661 - 678 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyse PP as NP. An argument PP has the same status as NP in the argument structure while they are in complementary distribution in the categorial structure.
In the traditional grammar based on Latin, PP has been treated as an adverbial constituent because Latin doesn't have PP corresponding to English PP.
Within the domain of formal syntax, PP is one of the universal major categories with NP, VP, and AP and "preposition stranding" have been explained by ECP and Case Theory. However, the formal analysis has too many counterexamples to solve them theory-internally. In addition, PP is different from the other major categories in that its meaning depends on its complement NP, not the head, preposition.
This study argues that PP typically occurs except before and after verb, that PP and NP overlap in the focus position of cleft sentence and COMP, which demonstrates the two categories share some properties in the argument structure, and that "preposition stranding" is a mapping process of an argument to NP or PP (in LFG). A locative argument can be realized as subject PP with a theme (In the comer was a lamp.) A peripheral locative argument can be subject NP with an missing agent (This bed was slept in).
In sum, the syntactic similarity of NP and PP can be found in the argument structure and the distribution of the two categories are determined by the construction-specific rule in English.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. PP의 형식적 분석과 한계
Ⅲ. PP의 기능적 분석
Ⅳ. PP와 NP의 분포
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0