지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Divorce is the legal termination of a marriage in the United States. But in some states, divorce is called dissolution or dissolution of marriage. A divorce or dissolution severs a marriage. This discussion refers to civil annulments; within the Roman Catholic Church, a couple may obtain a religious annulment after obtaining a civil divorce, in order for one or both spouses to remarry.
It has now been more forty years since California, in late 1960s, launched the modem-day reform movement in divorce laws by adopting the first no-fault divorce law in the United States and eliminating the concept of fault in marriage dissolution actions. The no-fault movement was premised on the idea that the removal of fault as a basis for divorce would significantly reduce the amount of personal animosity and bitterness typically associated with divorce. While the actual terminology of no-fault grounds may vary from state to state, they share a common theoretical basis allowing for the dissolution of marriages deemed no longer viable, regardless of cause, rather than requiring that dissolution be granted only if based on the fault of one of the parties.
Following California's lead, in August, 1970, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, recommending that the sole ground for divorce should be a finding of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. Delays in obtaining an endorsement of the UMDA by the American Bar Association meant that states eager to reform their divorce laws looked to the California legislation or early versions of the UMDA for guidance.
The focus of this article is to examine the historical development and current status of one particular no-fault divorce issue associated with the dissolution of a marriage. A comparison of approach to no-fault divorce law in the United States with fault divorce law in the Korea should highlight the debate on these important issues of public policy.
It has now been more forty years since California, in late 1960s, launched the modem-day reform movement in divorce laws by adopting the first no-fault divorce law in the United States and eliminating the concept of fault in marriage dissolution actions. The no-fault movement was premised on the idea that the removal of fault as a basis for divorce would significantly reduce the amount of personal animosity and bitterness typically associated with divorce. While the actual terminology of no-fault grounds may vary from state to state, they share a common theoretical basis allowing for the dissolution of marriages deemed no longer viable, regardless of cause, rather than requiring that dissolution be granted only if based on the fault of one of the parties.
Following California's lead, in August, 1970, the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) was proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, recommending that the sole ground for divorce should be a finding of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. Delays in obtaining an endorsement of the UMDA by the American Bar Association meant that states eager to reform their divorce laws looked to the California legislation or early versions of the UMDA for guidance.
The focus of this article is to examine the historical development and current status of one particular no-fault divorce issue associated with the dissolution of a marriage. A comparison of approach to no-fault divorce law in the United States with fault divorce law in the Korea should highlight the debate on these important issues of public policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 글머리
Ⅱ. 이혼의 유형
Ⅲ. 이혼의 성립요건
Ⅳ. 이혼의 법률효과
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
파탄주의 이혼원인 입법례에 관한 약간의 고찰
가족법연구
2018 .01
-
MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE IN U.S.
저스티스
1962 .05
-
재판상 이혼원인에서 파탄주의 도입에 관한 제언
가족법연구
2018 .01
-
유책배우자의 이혼청구권과 파탄주의
원광법학
2010 .01
-
이혼법의 최근동향 : 국가역할변화를 중심으로
법학연구
2010 .06
-
歐美離婚法 比較研究
법학연구
2006 .12
-
전환기의 유럽 이혼법 : 유럽이혼법원칙과 영․불․독 이혼법의 비교를 중심으로
법학연구
2009 .12
-
Physical and Mental Health Differential by Income Level Amongst the Divorced: A Focus on Midlife Divorce
International Journal of Human Ecology
2006 .01
-
이혼에 관한 무슬림들의 인식과 실천 - 카타르, 이집트, 모로코, 튀니지, 터키의 비교연구
지중해지역연구
2006 .01
-
여성의 잠재적 이혼 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인
비판사회정책
2006 .08
-
여성장애인의 이혼경험에 관한 질적사례연구
한국가족복지학
2015 .01
-
이혼 가족 아동
아동학회지
2009 .12
-
이혼가정 아동의 성별에 따른 부모이혼신념 영향요인
정신간호학회지
2009 .01
-
부모의 이혼여부에 따른 청소년의 우울지각 : 청소년이 지각한 부모의 양육태도와 교우관계를 중심으로
아동학회지
2004 .12
-
초기노년기 이혼여성의 이혼 후 적응경험에 관한질적 사례연구: 이혼초기 2년을 중심으로
한국가족복지학
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018391062