지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article started from the question as “what relation does art criticism has to a discourse of identity?”. That ‘nationalism’ is brought as one of discourse of identity is because ‘nationalism’ relates to a border distinguishing ‘the inside’ and ‘the outside’ despite a number of abates surrounding the term. This writing is divided into three parts as a whole. First part will examine the notion of nationality in relation to art criticism. What do the nationalities mean when we say for example, “American Type Painting”, “German Neo Expressionism”, “Young British Artists”? Is it just the nationality to which the artist belong? Or is it a specific trend that identifies the national origin? Second part will generally explore the problem of nationalism in the recent history of Korean art and art criticism. I will expecially study the case of “Minjok Girokhwa(Documentary Paintings for the Korean People)” of 1970s, and the case of “Minjoong Misul(People’s Art Movement)” of 1980s. The final part will discuss the relationship between nationalism and art critical practice. If art criticism lost its critical vantage point from which to make an aesthetic judgment, how will a critic from the third world critically be able to reveal “difference” of the culture he or she belongs to?
Recent post-colonial arguments were pointing out that overheated nationalism in independent nations after colony these days challenges imperialistic culture too easily, and unmaturely refuses it. Accepting nationalism is to receive the racial, religious and political separation imposed by imperialism. Then, “will to such difference” falls into self-defeating excuse to be resulted in understanding his or her society as defensive and negative compared to the counterpart, far more developed western world. Since it simply repeats dichotomized contradictory structure and hierarchy of a discourse on colony.
However, in the political, economic and cultural context of globalized international capitalism nowadays, the issue as to how non-western, non-European countries will initiatively participate is not properly theorized as yet. Nationalism is laid in conflicting desire. It maintains support for development for the future, strong attachment and nostalgia to convention and tradition. Thus nationalism is paradox encouraging something to go forward a target with face toward the past, and it can’t help being disrupted by this paradox.
This paper attempted to specifically investigate how this paradox functions in Korean circumstances. This is paradox, so does not come up with a solution, but it is expected that nationalism is a discourse on both identity and subjectivity, so that art criticism will more effectively perform its parametric play by shifting dischotomized border called ‘the inside’ and ‘the outside’ to more relational and indra-network mechanism. The failure of nationalism may have been stemmed not from the fact that they do not exist, but an excessive attachment to that they can be found. Like a zen monk’s “hwadu” for example, the query of “what is this?”, the question concerning one’s own identity or subjectivity cannot be avoided if only it is just to arrive to the point of enlightenment of “nothing there” Art critics always reposit the questions for the artworks as a kind of their own way of cultural participation.
Recent post-colonial arguments were pointing out that overheated nationalism in independent nations after colony these days challenges imperialistic culture too easily, and unmaturely refuses it. Accepting nationalism is to receive the racial, religious and political separation imposed by imperialism. Then, “will to such difference” falls into self-defeating excuse to be resulted in understanding his or her society as defensive and negative compared to the counterpart, far more developed western world. Since it simply repeats dichotomized contradictory structure and hierarchy of a discourse on colony.
However, in the political, economic and cultural context of globalized international capitalism nowadays, the issue as to how non-western, non-European countries will initiatively participate is not properly theorized as yet. Nationalism is laid in conflicting desire. It maintains support for development for the future, strong attachment and nostalgia to convention and tradition. Thus nationalism is paradox encouraging something to go forward a target with face toward the past, and it can’t help being disrupted by this paradox.
This paper attempted to specifically investigate how this paradox functions in Korean circumstances. This is paradox, so does not come up with a solution, but it is expected that nationalism is a discourse on both identity and subjectivity, so that art criticism will more effectively perform its parametric play by shifting dischotomized border called ‘the inside’ and ‘the outside’ to more relational and indra-network mechanism. The failure of nationalism may have been stemmed not from the fact that they do not exist, but an excessive attachment to that they can be found. Like a zen monk’s “hwadu” for example, the query of “what is this?”, the question concerning one’s own identity or subjectivity cannot be avoided if only it is just to arrive to the point of enlightenment of “nothing there” Art critics always reposit the questions for the artworks as a kind of their own way of cultural participation.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 내셔널리즘의 다양한 방식들
Ⅲ. 내셔널리즘과 한국미술
Ⅳ. 내셔널리즘과 미술비평의 보편성
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현대 한국미술과 민족주의란 두 개의 얼굴
미술이론과 현장
2006 .01
-
현대 미술비평의 난점과 그 대안
현대미술사연구
2001 .05
-
비평의 재구성 : 한국 미술비평의 과제 설정을 위한 제안
한국예술연구
2010 .06
-
한국 민족주의 영화의 흐름과 특성 : 1990년대 이후 작품을 중심으로
영화연구
2010 .12
-
모두를 위한 엘리트주의 : 공동체적 가치의 담론 장場으로서 미술비평
현대미술학 논문집
2009 .12
-
1950년대의 한국미술(1), 제1공화국 미술의 태동과 진통
미술사논단
2015 .06
-
미술비평의 효용성에 대해 다시 묻는다 : 아서 단토의 ‘미술종말론’에 대한 비평적 독서
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
-
스포츠내셔널리즘의 형성과 맥락 : 새로운 시선
움직임의 철학: 한국체육철학회지
2010 .12
-
〈민족과 운명〉의 민족주의담론 연구 : 연속편 〈어제, 오늘 그리고 래일〉을 중심으로
영화연구
2006 .04
-
민족주의적 스포츠에 관한 재조명
움직임의 철학: 한국체육철학회지
2000 .06
-
미술비평가 나혜석
미술사논단
2012 .12
-
미술의 공공성을 둘러싼 경합의 위상학 : 일본에서의 미술가·비평가 탄생에 대한 재해석
한국근현대미술사학
2009 .12
-
근대 유럽의 공공전시와 미술비평의 등장 : 18세기 프랑스와 영국의 사례
미술사학
2015 .08
-
1950년대 이경성의 미술비평관
한국근현대미술사학
2011 .12
-
또 하나의 냉전 : 미군 점령기(1945-1951) 일본에서의 ‘민주주의’적인 프랑스 미술의 궤적
현대미술사연구
2006 .06
-
전후 한미관계와 미술의 탈식민주의
서양미술사학회논문집
1999 .06
-
미술연구의 학문적 특성과 범주
미술문화연구
2013 .12
-
Glocalization 시대의 현대미술
현대미술학 논문집
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-018806797