메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계 大韓建築學會論文集 構造系 第25卷 第10號
발행연도
2009.10
수록면
3 - 10 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Genetic algorithms(GA) have been introduced to the field of design optimization during 20 years because it can find near global optimum. In spite of extensive studies of GA applied to truss optimization, it is limited to use for engineering practice as an optimization tool. The causes are originated from the following three points. First, it is not enough to show the advantages of GA compared with the traditional trial and error method. Second, it is wondered if GA can give the reliable results at all cases due to the probability concept and random number. Third, how many iterations of re-analysis will be needed to satisfy the stress and displacement constraints. This study is to answer these questions. For this, various simulations are performed with the typical benchmark problem of 10-bar truss as an initial stage of the study. Simulation results are compared to each other in view of not only the speed of GA but also the number of re-analysis. GA show more effective than trial and error method for small sized problem.
As it goes to large problem with many members and load combinations, the advantage of GA is decreased. In the 31-bar truss problem considering actual discrete variable, the performance of GA is similar to that of trial-and-error method. Furthermore, for specific dome structure with over 5000 members, trial and error method is more efficient because it can arrive at the near optimum value. In this paper, the optimum design system is developed based on the trial and error method because it can consider practical conditions; that is, many load combinations, discrete design variables by member database and member grouping technique.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 최적화 기법
3. 최적화 대상 문제
4. 성능 평가 변수 및 비교 조건
5. 성능 평가
6. 31-bar 트러스에 대한 적용성 평가
7. 돔 구조물에 대한 최적 설계
8. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-018989613