지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study tried to clarify the process and the remander subjects of Geochang massacre. It focused large-scale civilian massacre occurred in Geochang area during the Korean War in February 1951. Since massacre is not a simple revenge or result of battle, it analyzed operation orders of subjugation of the 11th Division and the 9th regiment that brought civilian bloodshed. Foundation of 11th Division was to suppress red guerillas and the people’s army once occupied Geochang-gun ruling Shinwon-myun. 3rd battalion of the 9th regiment tried to recover Shinwon area by an operation order that was remained as un-reclaimed area.
Massacre of Geochang was exposed at the National Assembly during the Korean war and the Assembly pressured Lee Seung-man government with the authenticity of Geochang incident. At the time, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Home Affair, and the Ministry of Justice investigated individually as well as jointly and the army executed report of the 11th division commander and investigation of the provost marshal headquarters. However, the truth of the civilian massacre was not cleared up and Lee Seung-man government even concealed and manipulated the truth. So the National Assembly formed a special investigation committee for Geochang incident to start investigation. However, the army disrupted the spot investigation of the Assembly. The army camouflaged as red guerilla and tried to shoot the members of the Assembly who were heading to the site of slaughter. As a result, the investigation committee gave up the spot investigation and finished the investigation with testimonies from related people. At the end, Shin Seong-Mo, the Minister of Defense, resigned and the people related to this matter were prosecuted as a result of full-scale investigation. After a military trial, some commanding officers were sentenced imprisonment.
This study looked into dealing with process of Geochang massacre focusing on the remander subject. Especially, the first argument is the date of massacre. After It occured in February 1951, the beginning date is 8th or 9th February and the end of date is 11th or 12th February 1951. The fact that is aroused a controversy. The Second argument is pictures, which are taken of the very spot where the massacre took place. The pictures is to be sure at that time and during the military trial. But now days, I do not know the pictures where to be.
Massacre of Geochang was exposed at the National Assembly during the Korean war and the Assembly pressured Lee Seung-man government with the authenticity of Geochang incident. At the time, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Home Affair, and the Ministry of Justice investigated individually as well as jointly and the army executed report of the 11th division commander and investigation of the provost marshal headquarters. However, the truth of the civilian massacre was not cleared up and Lee Seung-man government even concealed and manipulated the truth. So the National Assembly formed a special investigation committee for Geochang incident to start investigation. However, the army disrupted the spot investigation of the Assembly. The army camouflaged as red guerilla and tried to shoot the members of the Assembly who were heading to the site of slaughter. As a result, the investigation committee gave up the spot investigation and finished the investigation with testimonies from related people. At the end, Shin Seong-Mo, the Minister of Defense, resigned and the people related to this matter were prosecuted as a result of full-scale investigation. After a military trial, some commanding officers were sentenced imprisonment.
This study looked into dealing with process of Geochang massacre focusing on the remander subject. Especially, the first argument is the date of massacre. After It occured in February 1951, the beginning date is 8th or 9th February and the end of date is 11th or 12th February 1951. The fact that is aroused a controversy. The Second argument is pictures, which are taken of the very spot where the massacre took place. The pictures is to be sure at that time and during the military trial. But now days, I do not know the pictures where to be.
목차
머리말
1. 사건의 재구성
2. 전시 국회의 역할과 정부의 사건 은폐
3. 군법회의 쟁점과 한계
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[기획2 : 전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국가의 책임] 한국전쟁기 민간인 학살에 관한 자료 실태와 연구현황
역사와현실
2004 .12
-
제2대와 제4대 국회의 학살사건 처리 비교 연구 : 특별위원회 활동을 중심으로
한국사연구
2019 .03
-
경남지역 민간인 학살 연구의 현황과 과제
역사와경계
2005 .09
-
보도연맹원 학살과 지역사회의 지배구조 - 경남 마산지역의 사례와 인물을 중심으로 -
역사와경계
2005 .09
-
거창민간인학살사건과 증언시의 논리
한국문학논총
2004 .01
-
[기획4 : 전쟁기 민간인 학살과 국가의 책임] 6ㆍ25 남북전쟁시기 이북지역에서의 민간인 학살
역사와현실
2004 .12
-
한국의 민간인 학살사건 재판연구 : 경주 내남면 학살사건 재판사례를 중심으로
한국사학보
2010 .05
-
한국전쟁 전 대구경북지역의 민간인학살사건의 실태와 특징 - 제4대국회「양민학살사건진상조사보고서」의 기록을 중심으로 -
대구사학
2011 .01
-
양민학살사건에 따른 공동체문화의 파괴와 민속문화적 대응양상 : 전남 함평군 월야면 양민학살사건을 중심으로
한국민속학
2002 .06
-
6 · 25전쟁 개전 초기(1950.6-9) 민간인 집단희생과 한국 기독교의 관계
한국기독교와 역사
2016 .03
-
한국전쟁기 강화도에서의 대량학살사건과 트라우마 : 1950년 10월~1951년 6월을 중심으로
제노사이드연구
2008 .02
-
‘학살은 재현될 수 있는가’라는 질문을 역사화하기 : 1980년대 후반 소설의 정치적 무의식과 ‘거창사건’
동악어문학
2019 .10
-
진주 지역 국민보도연맹사건 희생자와 유족들 : 구술 사례를 중심으로
역사비평
2011 .08
-
민간인 피학살자 유족회의 결성과정과 유족의 역사인식에 대한 연구 : 경북 청도지역의 사례를 중심으로
제노사이드연구
2007 .02
-
세계사 속의 5.18 -피털루, 잘리안왈라공원, 그리고 광주-
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
한말 일제의 침략과 義兵 虐殺
역사와 담론
2009 .04
-
이오네스코의 「대학살놀이」(Jeux de Massacre) 내의 미메시스적 충동 읽기
영어영문학
2012 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
진영지역 학살과 진실규명 : 역사의 법정과 희생자 복원
한성훈
역사연구
2011
.12
과거청산과 민주주의 실현 : 진실화해위원회 활동과 권고사항의 이행기 정의를 중심으로
한성훈
역사비평
2010
.11
북한 인민 형성에 관한 사회학자의 역사적 접근 : 『전쟁과 인민-북한 사회주의 체제의 성립과 인민의 탄생』한성훈, 지음, 돌베개, 2012.
한모니까
역사비평
2012
.11
지연된 진실규명, 더욱 지연된 후속작업 : 진실화해위원회 활동의 완수를 위한 과제들
김동춘
역사비평
2012
.08
한국전쟁기 남한(유엔군)ㆍ북한의 ‘점령통치’에 대한 연구사 검토와 제언
한모니까
역사와현실
2012
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-392-002319162