지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2003.10
- 수록면
- 491 - 510 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study will look into the trade disputes between Korea and China received by KCAB when the amount of trade was growing at more than 20%. after the two countries entered into diplomatic relations.
For the sake of analysis, the trade disputes are broken down into the following classifications: export & import, cause, and method of payment.
Of the 59 trade disputes, 21 cases(35.6%) were claims involving export to China and 38 cases(64,4%) involved claims of import from China. Among the export-related cases, payment for goods was the most prevalent cause for claims whereas breach of contract and inferior goods were the leading causes for claims in the import-relates cases. When classified by the method of payment, there is a difference between the cases involving export and there involving import. Among the export-related cases, about 33%. involved L/C, around 33%. involved T/T, and 20%. involved D/A
However, among the import-related cases, about 66%. were L/C cases and 32% were T/T cases.
Looking at dispute cases classified by export & import, by cause and by the method of payment, claims related to incomplete methods payment for goods such as L/C, T/T,22 D/A were most prevalent.
In cases involving import, it was found that there was a direct connection to goods as breach of contract or inferior goods. I will make alternative proposals on the basis of statistical analysis by export & import, cause of claim and the method of payment. First, international trade contracts should be made and a credit inquiry of the trade partner should be made.
Second, because a lot of disputes arise related to the payment of goods in cases of export and related to breach of contract, inferior goods in cases of import, there should be a clear agreement on the method of payment, the time of quality decision, and the method of quality decision in quality terms.
Third, when Chinese firms import from Korean firms, they choose L/C or the method of prior settlement but when Chinese firms export to Korean firms, they choose D/A or the method of post settlement.
Therefore, Korean firms should exercise prudence in choosing the method of payment when making contract with Chinese firms.
For the sake of analysis, the trade disputes are broken down into the following classifications: export & import, cause, and method of payment.
Of the 59 trade disputes, 21 cases(35.6%) were claims involving export to China and 38 cases(64,4%) involved claims of import from China. Among the export-related cases, payment for goods was the most prevalent cause for claims whereas breach of contract and inferior goods were the leading causes for claims in the import-relates cases. When classified by the method of payment, there is a difference between the cases involving export and there involving import. Among the export-related cases, about 33%. involved L/C, around 33%. involved T/T, and 20%. involved D/A
However, among the import-related cases, about 66%. were L/C cases and 32% were T/T cases.
Looking at dispute cases classified by export & import, by cause and by the method of payment, claims related to incomplete methods payment for goods such as L/C, T/T,22 D/A were most prevalent.
In cases involving import, it was found that there was a direct connection to goods as breach of contract or inferior goods. I will make alternative proposals on the basis of statistical analysis by export & import, cause of claim and the method of payment. First, international trade contracts should be made and a credit inquiry of the trade partner should be made.
Second, because a lot of disputes arise related to the payment of goods in cases of export and related to breach of contract, inferior goods in cases of import, there should be a clear agreement on the method of payment, the time of quality decision, and the method of quality decision in quality terms.
Third, when Chinese firms import from Korean firms, they choose L/C or the method of prior settlement but when Chinese firms export to Korean firms, they choose D/A or the method of post settlement.
Therefore, Korean firms should exercise prudence in choosing the method of payment when making contract with Chinese firms.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 무역분쟁의 기본개념
Ⅲ. 대중국 무역분쟁의 현황과 분석
Ⅳ. 대중국 무역분쟁의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
수출기업의 대금결제방식 결정요인에 관한 실증연구
무역학회지
2007 .02
-
輸出決濟條件의 최근 動向과 示唆點
관세학회지
2002 .02
-
무역거래에서 송금(T/T)방식의 결제 위험성에 영향을 미치는 요인분석
무역학회지
2019 .12
-
貿易決濟方式 變化要因에 관한 硏究
무역학회지
2001 .06
-
수출대금결제방식의 결정요인에 관한 실증적 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
대중수출기업의 결제위험관리방안에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2005 .12
-
Determinants of Korea's Imports and its Effects on Distribution of Firms
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2017 .10
-
무역결제방식의 변화에 따른 수출보험제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2006 .09
-
수출대금결제리스크 관리에 관한 사례 연구
무역연구
2010 .01
-
수출결제방식 변화와 수출보험의 역할에 관한 연구
무역연구
2011 .01
-
수출이 수입유발에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .12
-
전자무역에서의 결제방법에 관한 연구
지역개발연구
2006 .06
-
The determinants of intra-firm trade by overseas affiliates of Korean firms
Journal of Economic Research (JER)
2016 .01
-
무역거래대금의 전자결제 활성화 요인에 관한 실증연구
무역학회지
2005 .10
-
Payment and Settlement Trends in 2003
[BOK] Quarterly Bulletin(QB)
2004 .03
-
우리나라의 대중국 수출 영향요인 분석 : 중국 31개 지역에 대하여
통상정보연구
2007 .12
-
Beyond Learning-by-Exporting : When Does Exporting Lead to Better Performance?
한국전략경영학회 학술대회발표논문집
2013 .03
-
추심결제(D/P, D/A)방식에서의 위험관리에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2008 .06
-
전자무역 네트워크에서 수출입 e-logistics 체계구축에 관한 연구
인터넷전자상거래연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002421190