메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
나양원 (울산대학교 의과대학 울산대학교병원) 남창우 (울산대학교 의과대학 울산대학교병원) 박능화 (울산대학교 의과대학 울산대학교병원) 신정우 (울산대학교 의과대학 울산대학교병원)
저널정보
한국간담췌외과학회 Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 한국간담췌외과학회지 제14권 제1호
발행연도
2010.3
수록면
30 - 36 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Postoperative as well as intention-to-treat outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria were compared to outcomes for patients who underwent liver resection. The goal was to select the optimal therapeutic option for these patients.
Methods: Among 1363 patients diagnosed with HCC between Jan 2001 and Sep 2008, 57 underwent liver resection for HCC within the Milan criteria (LRX group) and 47 registered for DDLT (WAIT group). Thirteen patients underwent DDLT (LTX group), including 2 salvage DDLT for recurrent HCC after resection. The outcomes for the LRX group were compared with those for the LTX and WAIT groups.
Results: Child class B or C patients accounted for 5% in the LRX group and 81% in the WAIT group (p=0.000). Among 47 registrants in the WAIT group, 11 underwent DDLT after a mean waiting time of 282 days (LTX group). Tweleve patients were dropped from the waitlist due to death or disease progression after a mean time of 317 days after registration. There was 1 operative death in the LTX group 14 days after DDLT due to primary graft nonfunction. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the LRX and LTX groups. On the other hand, the LRX group showed a significantly better intention-to-treat outcome than the WAIT group. The 3-year survival rates were 80.4% for the LRX group and 52.0% for the WAIT group (p=0.002).
Conclusion: For HCC patients within the Milan criteria, liver resection should be considered as their primary option of treatment in Korea, where the DDLT rate is below 6%.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-514-001278168