지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A dictionary is one essence of the history, culture, belief, and industrial capabilities of a language used in a community. Instead of popping up from nowhere one day, dictionaries are the achievement of all linguistic studies being properly integrated, including phoneme, grammar, meaning, and many more. This is why a dictionary is usually called a synthetic art of linguistics.
Despite such general understandings of dictionaries, only few sophisticated researches to examine the states of Korean dictionaries have been conducted in the past. This essay compares the definitions of four words, geulja(글자), munja(문자), geulssi(글씨), and ja(자), which appear in Korean dictionaries published from 1930"s. These four words all relate to the English words “letter” and “character.” In general, it is witnessed, the semantic diversities of munja itself have been gradually weakened, while geulja, munja, and geulssi have increasingly diverged themselves from one another in their meanings. Also, early dictionaries share common denominators in geulja, munja, and geulssi, whereas late dictionaries tend to minimize their differences.
Though revising Korean dictionaries may require considerable time and painstaking efforts, and though consequences might not be conspicious and satisfactory within a short amount of time, it will in the long run upgrade our cultural level tremendously. As much as macroscopic researches may do, microscophic approaches, like this one, will contribute to advancing Korean lexicography.
Despite such general understandings of dictionaries, only few sophisticated researches to examine the states of Korean dictionaries have been conducted in the past. This essay compares the definitions of four words, geulja(글자), munja(문자), geulssi(글씨), and ja(자), which appear in Korean dictionaries published from 1930"s. These four words all relate to the English words “letter” and “character.” In general, it is witnessed, the semantic diversities of munja itself have been gradually weakened, while geulja, munja, and geulssi have increasingly diverged themselves from one another in their meanings. Also, early dictionaries share common denominators in geulja, munja, and geulssi, whereas late dictionaries tend to minimize their differences.
Though revising Korean dictionaries may require considerable time and painstaking efforts, and though consequences might not be conspicious and satisfactory within a short amount of time, it will in the long run upgrade our cultural level tremendously. As much as macroscopic researches may do, microscophic approaches, like this one, will contribute to advancing Korean lexicography.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘문자’ 관련 어휘의 풀이말
3. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
부록
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-703-000756228