메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
형대조 (한동대학교)
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 58호
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
483 - 513 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Animated documentary which lies on the border between fiction and non-fiction, and also between animation and documentary, is not a new genre developed recently. However after Waltz with Bashir, the discussion and interest on the animated documentary has spread. The reason is because this new combination is a kind of challenge to the discussion on traditional documentary. The concept of animated documentary stretches the subject of documentary to a non-visible domain. The recent arguments give attention to the possibility of documentary expression with animation image. This animation image is considered to overcome or dismantle photographic referentiality, in the process of acceptance of animation into documentary. This study premises that the truth in a documentary exists in the audience’s gaze when a documentary contains any truth intended by the producer, in spite of that any kind of distortion is unavoidable where the reality in documentary has to be selected and reconstructed.
Nichols insists that it is a mode of documentary which changes, not the documentary’s ultimate characteristics by saying “What changes is the mode of representation, not the quality or ultimate status of the representation.”There is still an existing limit where the reconstruction has to be based on the ‘fact’ to have its value as realistic evidence or records in the context of documentary although the idea of using animation technique during the reconstruction in a documentary is widely accepted.
This study points out the limits of current discussions on the definition of animated documentary and brings up an argument on how animation becomes a documentary in different aspects. The study also reviews the current discussion in terms of the intention of a producer who chose the animation as a documentary tool and interpretation of the audience, whereas the current discussion is rather focused on text-animation itself at this time when animation was accepted as a new documentary tool.

목차

1. 서론
2. 애니메이션 vs. 애니메이티드 다큐멘터리 vs. 다큐멘터리
3. 애니메이션은 어떻게 다큐멘터리가 되는가?
4. <바시르와 왈츠를> vs. <페르세폴리스>
5. 나오는 글
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-688-000998122