지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique to organize a decision problem with its elements and a rational process to calculate numerical priorities of the decision alternatives. This study aims to analyze the importances of various SCM adoption factors by using AHP. Based on the previous researches on SCM adoption, we conducted AHP analysis for small-to-medium-sized enterprises(SMEs) in mechanical industry. SCM adoption factors were grouped into five categories: information management, support for activation, partnership, planning and collaboration, and performance management. The 58 SCM managers of total 200 samples in Daegu Metropolitan area responded to the survey .
The findings of this study are summarized as follows: in a criterion level, the importance of partners(0.2395) ranked the highest and information management(0.2232), planning and collaboration(0.2167), support for activation(0.1865), performance management(0.1341) followed. Top five priority criteria in the global level are as follows: mutual trust between supplier and purchaser(0.1118), IT usages on business transaction(0.1060), CEO’s commitment(0.0928), IT-based SCM investment(0.0720), and collaborative response(0.0691). Further analysis of the study suggests that each company needs different strategies to implement and operate SCM because each company has different priority in SCM adoption factors based on its relative position in the value-chain of the mechanical industry.
The findings of this study are summarized as follows: in a criterion level, the importance of partners(0.2395) ranked the highest and information management(0.2232), planning and collaboration(0.2167), support for activation(0.1865), performance management(0.1341) followed. Top five priority criteria in the global level are as follows: mutual trust between supplier and purchaser(0.1118), IT usages on business transaction(0.1060), CEO’s commitment(0.0928), IT-based SCM investment(0.0720), and collaborative response(0.0691). Further analysis of the study suggests that each company needs different strategies to implement and operate SCM because each company has different priority in SCM adoption factors based on its relative position in the value-chain of the mechanical industry.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행연구
3. 연구모형
4. 실증분석
5. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
SCM 성공요인이 프로세스 혁신과 경영성과에 미치는 영향
장길상
,
문성일
,
송정수
한국 SCM 학회지
2015
.05
SCM 시스템 성과 평가모형 개발 및 평가항목별 AHP 분석
박일규
,
김상훈
한국 SCM 학회지
2011
.05
AHP를 이용한 패밀리 레스토랑의 선택속성에 따른 선택대안 평가에 관한 연구
이정실
관광레저연구
2013
.05
AHP기법을 이용한 국제물류주선업체의 정기해운선사 선택요인에 관한 연구
송선옥
통상정보연구
2011
.06
기업간 협력관계가 공급사슬관리(SCM)성과에 미치는 영향 : 국내 자동차산업의 구매자 - 공급자 관계를 중심으로
정용균
,
조세형
,
김승철
한국 SCM 학회지
2007
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-320-001155940