본문 바로가기
  • 연구보고서

표지

DBpia에서 서비스 중인 논문에 한하여 피인용 수가 반영됩니다. 내서재에 논문을 담은 이용자 수의 총합입니다.

저작권자 요청에 따라 무료로 제공되는 논문입니다. 로그인 후 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초록·키워드 목차

This research investigated the domestic and foreign trend of farmed animal welfare and the policy direction of introducing farmed animal welfare to the Korea. Introduction of farmed animal welfare to the Korean livestock industry is a future direction in many ways. Introducing a concept of farmed animal welfare supplies the protein of good quality to the citizen, protects the sustainability of livestock industry, and guarantees the multi-functionality characteristics of agriculture.
With consumer survey result and previous research of changing production cost, this study identifies, there can be an economic incentive of introducing animal welfare in the production phase. So far, however, we have no standard or guideline for farmed animal welfare, the result is driven mostly from the data of “anti-biotic free” and “organic” licensed farm. Furthermore, changes of transportation and slaughtering costs are not derived from data restriction. Thus we still don’t has a clear shot of economic efficiency.
When considering the inherent characteristics of public benefit and market failure in farmed animal welfare, government needs to provide proper policy support to cure such problems. In this case, with the consumer survey result, expected price premium of animal welfare products can cover an increased production cost of farm.
To introduce farmed animal welfare, this study proposes several policy options. Firstly, it is necessary to provide enough information to both producer and consumer. Especially the research which relates with farmed animal welfare is not adequate to provide scientific knowledge and proper government policy. Secondly, it is important to show a future direction of policy provision. The government now enacts a law to introduce farmed animal welfare certification scheme in a market. However, producer and consumer don’t has enough information about the certification scheme. Without any proper information, market system can’t work efficiently. Thirdly, to maximize social welfare, the government’s intervention is very important. The government can choose several policy options such as direct payment, monitoring system, and setting standard with certification. The principle of economics indicates that incentive system is the best solution to cure existing market failure problem. Finally, this study suggests a new body, tentatively named “Korea Animal Welfare Council”, to discuss and manage domestic animal welfare issues.

[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표 차례
그림 차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 필요성과 목적
2. 선행연구 검토
3. 이론적 검토
4. 연구내용과 방법
[제2장 국내외 농장동물복지관련 동향]
1. 해외 농장동물복지관련 동향
2. 국제기구의 농장동물복지관련 동향
3. 국내 농장동물복지도입 동향
4. 해외 사례의 시사점
[제3장 업계의 농장동물복지도입 의향 조사]
1. 생산자 농장동물복지의향 조사
2. 도축단계 동물복지도입 관련조사
[제4장 동물복지형 축산물에 대한 소비자 가치 평가]
1. 동물복지형 축산물에 대한 소비자 인지도 및 인식조사
2. 동물복지형 축산물에 대한 소비자 가치평가
[제5장 농장동물복지 도입과 정책과제]
1. 동물복지형 축산도입 경제성 분석
2. 동물복지형 축산도입을 위한 정책과제
[제6장 요약 및 결론]
[부록]
[참고 문헌]

저자의 논문

DBpia에서 서비스 중인 논문에 한하여 피인용 수가 반영됩니다.
논문의 정보가 복사되었습니다.
붙여넣기 하세요.