지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 7 - 44 (40page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the 1970s, harmful effects of agricultural pesticides with the spread of green revolution have resulted in the rise of eco?friendly agriculture by a small number of farmers concerned about nature and life. Afterwards, eco?friendly agriculture has expanded as the government provided support to the eco?friendly farmers as a response to the opening of agriculture market to foreign imports. Governmental intervention was focused mainly on certification system and supply of materials for eco?friendly farming. However, the governmental support has resulted in the undermining of the cause and alternative value of eco?friendly agriculture as it was based on productivist model. This paper, with an attention to the alternative values of eco?friendly agriculture, examined the nation’s eco?friendly farming by testing ‘conventionalization hypothesis.’ In other words, we analyzed how the alternative values of eco?friendly agriculture contributed to the actual farming scenes, thereby assessing the performance of eco?friendly farming in Korean agriculture. And based on the evaluation, we reviewed the meaning and sustainability of the alternative values of eco?friendly agriculture in the context of overall Korean agriculture.
The data used in this research is based on results of a survey conducted from July 10 to August 25, 2014 for 538 farmers participating in eco?friendly education programs which were held throughout the nation. As a result of the survey, we obtained the following significant findings. First, eco?friendly agriculture has strengthened relationship. Farmers with higher level of practicing eco?friendly farming tend to have stronger relationship with the consumers. In particular, most of respondents said that as the rate of direct trade increased, relationship became more solid. Second, eco?friendly farming has led to improvement in ecology. Farmers with higher level of practicing eco?friendly farming experienced positive change in ecology (i.e. increase of the number of eco?friendly crops and size of farming land, etc.). Third, it was found that there is no definite relationship between farming land increase and the alternative values. Fourth, eco?friendly agriculture has not generated a positive result in terms of internal?dependence. That may be attributed to the government’s heavy focus on supporting eco?friendly agricultural materials from market, resulting in stagnation of internal circulation of agriculture. Fifth, farmers who wished to expand eco?friendly farming have relatively higher level of internal?dependence, ecology, and relationship.
In short, it is expected that eco?friendly farming may play a significant role in restoring relations that were damaged by conventional farming methods under the modern agri?food system. Based on what we found, we conclude that the ‘conventionalization’ of eco?friendly farming in Korea has not taken place. Yet, in order to heighten the sustainability, eco?friendly farming needs to improve internal?dependence by decreasing the farming material provided by the market via government policy.
The data used in this research is based on results of a survey conducted from July 10 to August 25, 2014 for 538 farmers participating in eco?friendly education programs which were held throughout the nation. As a result of the survey, we obtained the following significant findings. First, eco?friendly agriculture has strengthened relationship. Farmers with higher level of practicing eco?friendly farming tend to have stronger relationship with the consumers. In particular, most of respondents said that as the rate of direct trade increased, relationship became more solid. Second, eco?friendly farming has led to improvement in ecology. Farmers with higher level of practicing eco?friendly farming experienced positive change in ecology (i.e. increase of the number of eco?friendly crops and size of farming land, etc.). Third, it was found that there is no definite relationship between farming land increase and the alternative values. Fourth, eco?friendly agriculture has not generated a positive result in terms of internal?dependence. That may be attributed to the government’s heavy focus on supporting eco?friendly agricultural materials from market, resulting in stagnation of internal circulation of agriculture. Fifth, farmers who wished to expand eco?friendly farming have relatively higher level of internal?dependence, ecology, and relationship.
In short, it is expected that eco?friendly farming may play a significant role in restoring relations that were damaged by conventional farming methods under the modern agri?food system. Based on what we found, we conclude that the ‘conventionalization’ of eco?friendly farming in Korea has not taken place. Yet, in order to heighten the sustainability, eco?friendly farming needs to improve internal?dependence by decreasing the farming material provided by the market via government policy.
목차
1. 서론
2. 이론적 논의
3. 분석
4. 결론
참고문헌
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-300-001041116