메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영학회 경영학연구 경영학연구 제3권
발행연도
1974.2
수록면
111 - 122 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Objectives of this paper have been to search the lessons which Korea can learn from the direction in the formulation of the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. To aid in an understanding of this direction, I have discussed the evolutonairy and voluntary nature of their development and have described some of the major forces such as SEC, AICPA, AAA, etc. that have contributed to their development. Generally accepted accounting principles are the basic frame of reference in financial accounting. They have gained the respect and confidence of financial statement users. This development, however, is not comp1ete. It likely never will be. Many difficult and controversial problems remain. This paper suggests the following five point that Korea should consider in developing good financial accounting principles based on the direction in the formulation of the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. (1) Principles are broad, general statements which serve as guides for solving specific problems they are not detailed instructions. Currently a comprehensive consistent, and generally accepted body of accounting principles does not exist in the United States or Korea. A body of principles should consist of a few fundamental concepts Principles are not procedures. They should be differentiated each other. (2) It is impossible to, develop comprehensive and consistent set of principles which can be applied both financial accounting and management accounting. Accounting figures should always be discussed in terms of the particular problem that they are intended to help solve, rather, than in any abstract sense. Therefore, generally accepted accounting principles should not be regarded as business accounting principles. (3) The another semantic problem centers around the term $quot;accepted.$quot; We have to search $quot;generally acceptable financial accounting principles,$quot; not generally accepted accounting principles. To achieve this goal, $quot;inventory of generally accepted accounting principles for business enterprises$quot; in Korea like ARS No. 7 of AICPA should be searched not to discover new or bitter accounting principle but ① to present the basic concepts to which accounting principles are oriented, and ② to enumerate the principles or practices currently adhered to or employed by the accountant in fulfilling his financial reporting obligation. (4) Not like the United States financial accounting principle (standard) committee or board should should include at least one member from government. Since government must assure that the interested people have adequate information on which to base their decision. (5) Theory and practice can complement one another and provide a check-and-balance procedure in the development of accounting principles. The continual interaction between the two should emerge set of concepts which comprise what we want as generally acceptable financial accounting principles. Therefore, there should be a good research organization which can coordinate the interaction between KICPA and accounting theoretican such as college professor. Especially theoretican should organize a accounting oriented research group within or outside of Korean association of Business Administration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0