지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국일본어학회 일본어학연구 일본어학연구 제43집
- 발행연도
- 2015.3
- 수록면
- 151 - 166 (16page)
- DOI
- 10.14817/jlak.2015.43.151
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to explore patterns and language expressions on how male undergraduates use their strategies when they bring up topics.
Data was collected from 6 conversations between Korean and Japanese undergraduates who are in close relationships.
A total of 164 topics were collected from Korean and a total of 170 topics from Japanese. Of those, speakers that used strategies for bringing up the topics were as follows: Korean, 75EA(45.73%); Japanese, 68EA(40.00%). In contrast, speakers who are not strategic in bringing up topics were as follows: Korean, 87EA(54.27%); Japanese, 102EA(60.00%), which were very high.
The use of strategies in bringing up topics was related to the relevance of topics with the context, and was analyzed in terms of how polite the speakers were in their conversations. As a result, it was revealed that speakers in both Korean and Japanese mutually adopted the considerate behavior at the locutionary and discourse level complementarily.
The strategies in bringing up topics were analyzed by each aspect of the strategies such as [expression of meta], [expression for recognition changes], [discourse markers], and [expression for notice requirements]. As a result, [discourse markers] indicates that it is very high in the speakers’ discourse strategies.
Of the various expressions used by speakers’ discourse strategy, “야 (ya, 27times)” and “아 (ah, 23times)”, and “그런데 (by the way, 19times) were widely used in Korean.“え” (e, 15times), “でも” (but, 11times), “で “ (then, 11times), and “じゃ” (if so, 10times) were widely used in Japanese.
Data was collected from 6 conversations between Korean and Japanese undergraduates who are in close relationships.
A total of 164 topics were collected from Korean and a total of 170 topics from Japanese. Of those, speakers that used strategies for bringing up the topics were as follows: Korean, 75EA(45.73%); Japanese, 68EA(40.00%). In contrast, speakers who are not strategic in bringing up topics were as follows: Korean, 87EA(54.27%); Japanese, 102EA(60.00%), which were very high.
The use of strategies in bringing up topics was related to the relevance of topics with the context, and was analyzed in terms of how polite the speakers were in their conversations. As a result, it was revealed that speakers in both Korean and Japanese mutually adopted the considerate behavior at the locutionary and discourse level complementarily.
The strategies in bringing up topics were analyzed by each aspect of the strategies such as [expression of meta], [expression for recognition changes], [discourse markers], and [expression for notice requirements]. As a result, [discourse markers] indicates that it is very high in the speakers’ discourse strategies.
Of the various expressions used by speakers’ discourse strategy, “야 (ya, 27times)” and “아 (ah, 23times)”, and “그런데 (by the way, 19times) were widely used in Korean.“え” (e, 15times), “でも” (but, 11times), “で “ (then, 11times), and “じゃ” (if so, 10times) were widely used in Japanese.
목차
Abstract
1. 들어가며
2. 선행연구
3. 대화자료 및 분석 방법
4. 분석결과 및 고찰
5. 나가며
참고문헌
要旨
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李 正 子 / 2007 / 韓日若年層の話題及び會話內容に關する硏究 -アンケ-ト調査と會話分析を中心に- / 日本文化學報 (34) : 219 ~ 235
2. [보고서] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 2007 / 改訂版：基本的な文字化の原則(Basic Transcription System for Japanese:BTSJ)2007年3月31日改訂版, 談話研究と日本語教育の有機的統合のための基礎的研究とマルチメディア教材の試作 : 17 ~ 69
3. [보고서] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 2007 / 基本的な文字化の原則(Basic Transcription System for Japanese :BTSJ)の韓国語への応用について, 談話研究と日本語教育の有機的統合のための基礎的研究とマルチメディア教材の試作 : 48 ~ 82
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 1995 / 対話相手に応じた話題導入の仕方とその展開パターン‐初対面二者間の会話分析より / 名古屋学院大学日本語学·日本語教育論集 2 : 130 ~ 145
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 木暮律子 / 2002 / 日本語母語話者と日本語学習者の話題転換表現の使用について / 第二言語としての日本語の習得研究 5 : 5 ~ 23
2. [보고서] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 2007 / 改訂版：基本的な文字化の原則(Basic Transcription System for Japanese:BTSJ)2007年3月31日改訂版, 談話研究と日本語教育の有機的統合のための基礎的研究とマルチメディア教材の試作 : 17 ~ 69
3. [보고서] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 2007 / 基本的な文字化の原則(Basic Transcription System for Japanese :BTSJ)の韓国語への応用について, 談話研究と日本語教育の有機的統合のための基礎的研究とマルチメディア教材の試作 : 48 ~ 82
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 宇佐美まゆみ / 1995 / 対話相手に応じた話題導入の仕方とその展開パターン‐初対面二者間の会話分析より / 名古屋学院大学日本語学·日本語教育論集 2 : 130 ~ 145
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 木暮律子 / 2002 / 日本語母語話者と日本語学習者の話題転換表現の使用について / 第二言語としての日本語の習得研究 5 : 5 ~ 23
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
日韓中対照からみた日本語の談話構築態度 : 発想と表現の差を説明するモデルの検討
일본연구
2019 .02
-
談話標識の出現傾向からみた韓国人日本語学習者の談話展開の方法 : 日本人母語話者との比較を中心に
일본문화학보
2015 .02
-
国際調査からみる日韓大学生の依頼談話意識
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2019 .09
-
依頼談話における言いさし表現「けど」に関する考察 -機能と負担度に着目して-
일본문화학보
2020 .08
-
濟州方言 談話標識 ‘계메’의 韻律的 特性과談話的 機能의 相關關係
어문연구(語文硏究)
2015 .12
-
재난방송에서의 행위지시표현의 사용실태 －폭우특별경보(大雨特別警報)의 기상청회견 담화의 분석－
일본연구
2025 .02
-
呼びかけ語をめぐる諸問題の検討と定義の提案
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
国内外のジェンダー問題における日韓の正当化－YouTubeコメントに焦点を当ててー
日本語敎育
2022 .12
-
〈小學歌〉의 『小學』 수용과 문학적 의미
어문학
2017 .03
-
일본인 한국어 초급 학습자의 한국어에 대한 인식 : 일본 에히메현 소재 대학의 한국어 학습자 대상 설문 결과를 바탕으로
일본문화연구
2018 .07
-
1917년 러시아혁명과 일본 사회운동의 변환에 대한 일고찰
일본문화연구
2018 .01
-
韓国社会におけるK-Popの意義 : J-Popとの比較分析を通じて
일본문화연구
2015 .10
-
방정환과 예성타오 동화 비교
중국문화연구
2016 .02
-
皇民化時期(1937-1945) 대만 지식인의 민족정체성과 전쟁인식 : 『吳新榮日記』를 중심으로
중국근현대사연구
2016 .09
-
国際調査からみる日韓大学生の依頼談話意識
일본어학연구
2019 .12
-
日本語学習者の書きことばおよび普通体談話におけるノダ : 丁寧体談話との比較を通じて
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2017 .09
-
韓日対照談話論のこれから
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2017 .09
-
宣伝表現としての「話題」について-序
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2016 .03
-
담화에 없는 그
상상인
2025 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-730-001155524