메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
권성달 (웨스트민스터신학대학원대학교)
저널정보
대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제33호
발행연도
2013.10
수록면
7 - 33 (27page)
DOI
10.28977/jbtr.2013.10.33.7

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Tripartite nominal sentences in Biblical Hebrew refer to those verbless nominal sentences that include a third constituent (usually a 3rd person pronoun or a demonstrative) in addition to a subject and a predicate. In the realm of Biblical Hebrew linguistics, the past 100 years have seen constant research on nominal sentences, and especially there are still differences among views of tripartite nominal sentences. At the center of the controversy lies the question of what the identity and roles of the third element other than the subject and the predicate, that is to say the third person pronoun or the demonstrative (let’s call this third element special pronoun) are in tripartite nominal sentences.
The first task of this study is to explicate whether the special pronoun in tripartite nominal sentences is a copula, and the second is to investigate what its identity and roles are if it is not a copula.
In order to grasp the identity and role of tripartite nominal sentences in Biblical Hebrew, this study attempts at systematic and critical research on the basis of precise and diverse statistical data (our data was based on 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 1 Chronicles, and 2 Chronicles). The results clarified that the special pronoun in tripartite nominal sentences cannot be a copula. This is because tripartite nominal sentences cannot be regarded as having the same properties as bipartite nominal sentences as the two are too different in many respects. It is also confirmed, as a result of this study, that views that regard the structure of tripartite nominal sentences as extraposition or ‘casus pendens" are difficult to accept.
As a result of the investigation of the identity and roles of the special pronoun, i.e. the second task of this study, it is found to play two roles. Its first role is emphasis. Many of the researchers who mention emphasis regard the pronoun as emphasizing the subject, while only a few researchers say that it can emphasize the predicate as they take it to emphasize what is right in front of it. However, this study claims that the special pronoun emphasizes not only the subject and predicate but also the entire sentence in a tripartite nominal sentence. In tripartite nominal sentences, word order is not regularly determined, but diversified in accordance with degrees of the definiteness of the subject and predicate, and hence plays the role of emphasizing the entire sentence.
The second role is balancing the subject and the predicate. Like weights of a scale, the special pronoun plays the role of lifting the entire sentence while balancing the subject and the predicate. That is to say, when the weights of the subject and the predicate are identical (their definiteness being the same), it lifts the two in the middle of them. On the other hand, when the weight of the subject is lighter than that of the predicate, it plays the role of lifting the two while helping the predicate with relatively weak definiteness.

목차

1. 서론
2. 세 구성소 명사문장의 분포
3. 세 구성소 명사문장과 계사(copula)
4. 세 구성소 명사문장의 정체와 역할
5. 결론
참고문헌(References)
Abstract

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001304732