메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제77집
발행연도
2011.10
수록면
141 - 162 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Levinas accuses the modern autonomous subject of its being based on the egoistic solipsism. Husserl inspired Levinas of the exteriority of one`s conscience. However, the husserlian intentionality falls in solipsism by turing one`s conscience into the creator of meaning of the world. Kant conceives an other person by means of the universal concept of human as a reasonable being. When it comes to Heidegger, he reduces a concrete being to the impersonal Being and ignores the ethics. Levinas thinks of the history of western thoughts as that of ontology and identification. It is an ego-centric order with others separated from me. Such separation is for the purpose of one`s enjoyment, taking limited and measured responsibility for others` suffering. The modern autonomous subject exists in himself and for himself. The other persons are conceived from one self by one self. For Levinas, the other person cannot be grasped through the universal concept but leads me to unlimited responsibility for him. One has the sense of unlimited responsibility for others before he knows and intends spontaneously. It is through the passivity of such sensibility that Levinas intends to make ethics as an infinite responsibility for others the first philosophy. It is a way to prevent human thought from the violence of reducing the other to the same.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0