지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I studied two subject In this thesis. The first is a problem about a criteria judging the saisiot insertion in a compound, the second is about wether inserted saisiot is underlying elements or not. So far, many people have judged saisiot insertion by two phenomena. The ons is a glottalization of initial consonant of the following noun in a compound. The other is [n] insertion between two constituents n a compound. But that isn`t a conditioned environment of saisiot insertion. Because glottalization and [n] insertion is just one of the resultant phenomenon of saisiot insertion. Also it is difficult to prove that a glottalization of initial consonant of the following noun and [n] insertion in a compound is caused just in saisiot insertion. That is to say, other reason is able to be related in that phenomena. To be present, Many people agree that the saisiot insertion is decided according to a semantic relation of front ant rear constituents of compound. If that is true, I think, it is right that we judge wether saisiot is inserted or not by a semantic relation of front ant rear constituents of compound. Additionally, I raised a problem whether the inserted saisiot is Underlying element or is an element inserted during derivation process. In relation to this problem, I suggested that we need to classify compounds two sorts. The one is reconstructed after sisiot insertion, the other is non-reconstructed. The latter is a case that the saisiot is inserted during derivation process. At present, I don`t show a criteria sorting two cases clearly. But I just suggested that the saisiot insertion is diachronic phenomenon at least when the C1 is voiced consonant /n, m, g, 1/ in the environment of (C)VC1#C@V(C).
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002553148