메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김장민 (진보정책연구원)
저널정보
경상국립대학교 사회과학연구원(사회과학연구) 사회과학연구 사회과학연구 제31집
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
121 - 144 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to Marx, the trade union used to begin economic struggle, but should develop political struggle gradually. Both workers party and trade union represent the working class, but workers party is the more advanced part of the working class than trade union. Marx emphasized the independence of trade union from the workers party. Marx criticized the dependency of trade union on workers party.
Lenin also agreed the need for independence of trade union and economic struggle, but opposed the political neutrality of the trade union. According to Lenin, the workers party should lead the workers revolution movement through the trade union. Thus, the trade union should be led thoroughly by the workers party.
On the other hand, according to Rosa Luxemburg, the leadership of workers party on the trade union is not an absolute leadership but political leadership which should ensure the independence of the trade union and the autonomy of the mass.
Gramsci also emphasized the balance between conscious leadership of workers party and autonomy of the mass. According to Gramsci, the leadership of workers party on the mass is not compulsory leadership but democratic leadership which should unity discipline and creativity not mechanically but dialectically.

목차

I. 서론
II. 마르크스주의에서 노동자당과 노동조합의 관계
III. 결론
〈참고문헌〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-301-002794451