메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제20권 제1호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
29 - 52 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Illegal profits made from drug, organized and money-laundering crimes are used to maintain and reinforce criminal organizations or are laundered and reinvested in legitimate or illegitimate businesses. To completely remove the economic factors causing such crimes, the offenders should be deprived of all the economic profits they have made from crime. Article 7 of the FATF Forty Recommendations suggest that each nation enact a legislation similar to the corresponding article of the Vienna Convention so as to confiscate laundered assets, benefits made from money-laundering, instruments that are used or to be used for money-laundering, and any other assets equivalent to those assets. The current criminal law, however, stipulates that only the assets resulting or obtained from criminal acts are subject to forfeiture, leading to problems such as the very narrow range of confiscatable assets and the need to prove that the assets to be confiscated have been obtained from or related to a certain crime. Those problems make difficult the complete deprivation of criminal profits. Below comes an overview of the problems with our forfeiture laws, followed by an exploration of the possibility of employing the civil forfeiture scheme of the Anglo-American legal systems and a discussion of ways for improving our forfeiture scheme. Prior to employing a new forfeiture scheme, it is required to find ways to balance law enforcement agencies' active and effective crime control through deprivation of criminal profits with the protection of citizens' property rights.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0