메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sun-Woong Kim (Kwangwoon University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.19 Number.3
발행연도
2019.9
수록면
289 - 308 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The primary concern of this paper is why clefted XPs in English cleft sentences are categorially restricted: VP (and V as well), AP, and non-finite CP (CP[-fin]) are not eligible for clefting, while DP, PP, and finite CP (CP[+fin]) are. Under the assumption that cleft sentences in English can be derived either by movement or by base-generation of the clefted XP, it is claimed that the source of the categorial restriction can be both representational and derivational. The base-generation (or matching), requires a null operator (Op) movement for independent reasons, and this Op forms a relative clause with the clefted XP as its head noun (antecedent). Due to its non-nominal nature of AP, VP, or CP[-fin], those categories are not eligible for the antecedent of a relative clause with the null operator. This is a violation of the representational constraint. When the direct movement of the clefted XP is involved, this must obey a phase-based restriction on the deletion of the lower copy. When this condition is not met, the derivation crashes. This is a violation of the derivational constraint. Both representational and derivational considerations must be taken into to explain the categorial restriction. Two additional topics in clefts regarding “additional CP effect” and morphological mismatch are also discussed as extensions of the proposed analysis in the appendix.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Derivation of Cleft Sentences
3. Proposed Analysis
4. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-705-001240276