본문 바로가기
[학술저널]

  • 학술저널

Juliano Prado Stradioto(Federal University of Technology - Paraná) Ariel Orlei Michaloski(Federal University of Technology - Paraná) Antonio Augusto de Paula Xavier(Federal University of Technology - Paraná) Daniela Colombini(EPM IES (EPM International Ergonomics School))

DOI : 10.7232/iems.2020.19.4.790

표지

북마크 0

리뷰 0

이용수 3

피인용수 0

초록

The external plastering has a high rate of work accidents and corresponds to a large part of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) in construction. The objective of this research was to statistically correlate the RULA and OCRA Checklist ergonomic risk methods, used in external workstations on building facades. The methodological approach consisted of a quantitative and qualitative research, including literature review and field research, including 32 employees, with the project approved by the Institution’s Ethics and Research Committee. This research showed results that indicate the high physical requirements that the activity exerts on workers, a strong and significant statistical correlation between the methods, and that the OCRA checklist method is the best option among those for the ergonomic evaluation. The research showed limitations regarding the amount of ergonomic methods used as well as the difficult access to construction sites. The research leaves the possibility of future studies on the statistical comparison between other ergonomic methods, using a greater number of statistical tools, in addition to analyzing other activities that make up the execution of building work in civil construction.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
2. CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
3. METHODOLOGY
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5. CONCLUSION
6. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS
7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES

참고문헌(0)

리뷰(0)

도움이 되었어요.0

도움이 안되었어요.0

첫 리뷰를 남겨주세요.
DBpia에서 서비스 중인 논문에 한하여 피인용 수가 반영됩니다.
인용된 논문이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, 아래 [참고문헌 신청]을 통해서 등록해보세요.
Insert title here