지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제120호
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 231 - 263 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.06.120.231
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Peace Corps, founded under the Kennedy Administration to assist the United States in its foreign humanitarian aid, symbolized a fragmentary discourse of ‘war over peace’ to create an environment in favor of the American global imperative. Peace Corps was seen as an appropriate means to disseminate certain American ideals and values and expand American political, economic, and social agendas. This study examines how the ongoing discourse of ‘peace’ also arose in the negotiations for the Peace Corps Korea program to challenge the narrative and certain beliefs that Peace Corps Korea was a successful project of public diplomacy beneficient to the Korea-US relations.
Since Korea showed interest in the Peace Corps, debate over the suitability of the Korea program pervaded the minds of many American agencies involved. However, the American’s refusal to grant the Korean program in the first negotiation was an effect of the lack of singularity from the Korean government and the American development agencies in the determining program fields that would befit certain developmental justifications in Korea and, most importantly, a policy that pushed the Korean program back on the priority list. Later, the changing political climate in Indochina became a turning point in the negotiations. The Korean government’s proposal to send troops in aid to the Americans in Vietnam allowed the reopening of the negotiations to bring in Peace Corps to Korea. In return to the proposal, the US gave in in the second negotiation and provided immense human and material support to Korea. The discrepancy between Korean’s courtship to bring Peace Corps and Korean’s lack of interest in support and execution of the Korea program, however, suggests that Peace Corps Korea was a byproduct of other political motives apart from a developmental standpoint.
Since Korea showed interest in the Peace Corps, debate over the suitability of the Korea program pervaded the minds of many American agencies involved. However, the American’s refusal to grant the Korean program in the first negotiation was an effect of the lack of singularity from the Korean government and the American development agencies in the determining program fields that would befit certain developmental justifications in Korea and, most importantly, a policy that pushed the Korean program back on the priority list. Later, the changing political climate in Indochina became a turning point in the negotiations. The Korean government’s proposal to send troops in aid to the Americans in Vietnam allowed the reopening of the negotiations to bring in Peace Corps to Korea. In return to the proposal, the US gave in in the second negotiation and provided immense human and material support to Korea. The discrepancy between Korean’s courtship to bring Peace Corps and Korean’s lack of interest in support and execution of the Korea program, however, suggests that Peace Corps Korea was a byproduct of other political motives apart from a developmental standpoint.
목차
머리말
1. 평화봉사단의 성립과 냉전적 ‘평화’의 의미
2. 주한 미 평화봉사단 협상과정과 한미관계
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Peace Corps English Program and Language Planning in Korea
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .06
-
The Peace Corps Program in Korea, 1966-1981 : An English Linguistic Imperialism Perspective
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .06
-
Peace Corps English Program and Language Planning in Korea: 1966-1981
언어과학
2019 .01
-
Peace Treaty versus Democratic Peace as a Peace Building Measure in Northeast Asia
Korea Observer
2021 .09
-
평화의 감성과 개념의 은유적 이해
담화와인지
2020 .02
-
가톨릭의 평화사상과 평화권 연구 -한국사회의 새로운 평화원리 구상
가톨릭철학
2020 .01
-
The Korean Peace Agreement and the Korean Peace Regime: A Concrete Draft for Perpetual Peace in Practice
Korea Observer
2021 .01
-
Advancing Peace Linguistics: A Holistic Approach Integrating Galtung’s Theories and Linguistics
영어학연구
2024 .08
-
거짓 평화와 참 평화 : 미가 4장 1-5절을 중심으로
구약논단
2018 .12
-
정의로운 평화(Just Peace) 개념의 이론적 고찰 ― 세계교회협의회(WCC) 논의를 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2022 .04
-
평화의 이념적 확장과 ‘포스트 통일’
통일인문학
2016 .12
-
빼앗긴 마음에도 평화는 오는가? : 평화의 목회신학을 위하여
신학연구
2016 .06
-
남송 전기 ‘태평 분식’의 정치적 배경과 전개 양상
동양사학연구
2019 .12
-
동아시아의 평화를 향한 한·일 주교단의 도전
신학과 철학
2020 .01
-
한반도 평화, 칸트에게 길을 묻다
사회와 철학
2021 .04
-
지속 가능한 평화를 위한 생태신학적 전망
신학전망
2022 .03
-
평화를 위해선 평화를 준비하라! –평화를 위한 첫걸음, 동아시아사 독서토론수업 사례–
역사와교육
2022 .11
-
현대 기독교 평화교육의 동향과 미래적 전망
기독교교육 논총
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-911-001879507