메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조형열 (고려대학교)
저널정보
전북사학회 전북사학 전북사학 제49호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
213 - 240 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper reviewed the theoretical background of the two competing methodologies, i.e. the theory on the universality of the world history and the theory of Asiatic specificity, with focus on Marxist interpretation. In particular, this paper attempted to review the awareness of universality and specificity and acceptance of the Asiatic mode of production, which were mentioned in previous studies as important factors in the formation of historical research methodologies, in phases, and thus internally analyze their critical mind. The awareness of universality and specificity started from the understanding of the concepts of universality and specificity, the method of applying abstract methodologies, and the interpretation of the correlation between the history of mankind and natural environment. The universalists, including Baek Nam-un, who regarded specificity as non-essential, emphasize the abstraction of universality, and understood the influence of the natural world in a limited way. However, specificists like Lee Cheong-won argued that specificity is also essential, and specificity must be abstracted for the sake of social practices, and regarded the influence of nature as important in certain stages of the history of mankind. The positions of these two camps were reflected in the process of accepting the theory on the Asiatic mode of production, which had a strong influence on the academic circles of East Asian thought in the 1930's. The former paid attention to the fact that it is possible to enhance the awareness of discrimination of Asia from the viewpoint of universality, understood the Asiatic mode of production as the Asiatic form of a feudal society, and had a reservation to acceptance of the theory. However, the latter regarded it as a theory that most accurately described the realities of Asian societies, including Joseon, most accurately from the viewpoint of specificity, and advocated active acceptance of the theory.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0