지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第157輯
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 489 - 532 (44page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2021.12.157.489
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article pays attention to the debate on the controlled economy by provincial governments, which aims to analyze the contents of the debates and to clarify their contemporary context of 1930s. Intellectuals of the time basically derived the debate from the theoretical and practical ground of the theory of controlled economy in the same period, but the aftermath of the two came to be developed in a distinctive way. The distinction lay in the difference between the geopolitical level of the nation-state and that of the provinces when discussing the obligation of the time, particularly anti-Imperialism and anti-Feudalism. Whereas general discourse of the controlled economy presupposed the central government of the nation-state as a proper unit for administrative agency, the discourse on the controlled economy by provincial governments necessarily and significantly distant from the strong attachment to the nation-state. For provincial governments claiming the controlled economy was considered a good opportunity for possessing a leading authority to the construction of nation-state, and the pursuits also worked for the strengthening of provincial identity.
Such composition of discourse brought about the trait of rivalry between centralization and decentralization. Either intended or not, it was attached in the discourse of controlled economy the context of locality versus center and that of rule-by-government versus rule-by-governments. The narrative of centralization defined the provincial governments’ claim of controlled economy as feudalistic separatist economy, in other words, disrupting the foundation of national economy and the true unification of China of overcoming semi-colonial condition and integrating the nation. However, the province-centered narrative claimed that the realization of controlled economy by provincial government would complement the central government, expand the authority and autonomy of provinces, and eventually contribute to the national economy.
The trait or limitation of the debates on the controlled economy by provincial government lay in the fact that the issue of provincial autonomy was barely treated to the extent of reformation of political system or expansion of democracy and autonomy from the bottom. Intellectuals mostly did not took advantage of the legacy despite the recognition of the history in 1920s when the movements for inter-provincial autonomy stimulated the pursuit of decentralization. It primarily reveals the still-powerful entity of warlords, but it also tells the predominant narrative of nation-building in the 1930s so much so to dwarf the significance of the slogan, anti-Imperialism and anti-Feudalism. However, as seen in the lively construction of economy in Shanxi and Guangdong provinces in 1930s there existed some space for the provincial government more proper as the agency of the controlled economy, and there also existed some practical results that could be assessed for the realization of the anti-Imperialism and anti-Feudalism. It is likely to be the significant case of showing the aporia of the task of nation-building in the 1930s, the crossing and rivalry between centralization and decentralization of authority circumscribing the discourse of controlled economy by provincial government. Nevertheless of the overwhelming narrative of centralization, it is still worthwhile to rethink the meaning of the controlled economy of provincial government. We need to shed enough lights on the current of pursuing decentralization that had competed against it.
Such composition of discourse brought about the trait of rivalry between centralization and decentralization. Either intended or not, it was attached in the discourse of controlled economy the context of locality versus center and that of rule-by-government versus rule-by-governments. The narrative of centralization defined the provincial governments’ claim of controlled economy as feudalistic separatist economy, in other words, disrupting the foundation of national economy and the true unification of China of overcoming semi-colonial condition and integrating the nation. However, the province-centered narrative claimed that the realization of controlled economy by provincial government would complement the central government, expand the authority and autonomy of provinces, and eventually contribute to the national economy.
The trait or limitation of the debates on the controlled economy by provincial government lay in the fact that the issue of provincial autonomy was barely treated to the extent of reformation of political system or expansion of democracy and autonomy from the bottom. Intellectuals mostly did not took advantage of the legacy despite the recognition of the history in 1920s when the movements for inter-provincial autonomy stimulated the pursuit of decentralization. It primarily reveals the still-powerful entity of warlords, but it also tells the predominant narrative of nation-building in the 1930s so much so to dwarf the significance of the slogan, anti-Imperialism and anti-Feudalism. However, as seen in the lively construction of economy in Shanxi and Guangdong provinces in 1930s there existed some space for the provincial government more proper as the agency of the controlled economy, and there also existed some practical results that could be assessed for the realization of the anti-Imperialism and anti-Feudalism. It is likely to be the significant case of showing the aporia of the task of nation-building in the 1930s, the crossing and rivalry between centralization and decentralization of authority circumscribing the discourse of controlled economy by provincial government. Nevertheless of the overwhelming narrative of centralization, it is still worthwhile to rethink the meaning of the controlled economy of provincial government. We need to shed enough lights on the current of pursuing decentralization that had competed against it.
#성통제경제
#통제경제론
#민족경제
#할거경제
#반제반봉건
#남경국민정부
#국가건설
#집권
#분권
#省统制经济
#统制经济论
#民族经济
#割据经济
#反帝反封建
#南京国民政府
#国家建设
#集权
#分权
#the Controlled Economy by Provincial Governments
#Controlled Economy
#National Economy
#Separatist Economy
#anti-imperialism and anti-feudalism
#Nanjing Nationalist Government of China
#nation-building
#centralization
#decentralization
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1930년대 중반 省統制經濟의 쟁점화
Ⅲ. 省統制經濟를 둘러싼 서사의 경합
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (66)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아 전시체제와 중국의 노동조직
중국근현대사연구
2018 .03
-
20세기 초 중국의 문물(文物) 관리체계의 형성 — 베이징(北京)의 사례를 중심으로 —
중국근현대사연구
2021 .12
-
《朝鮮總督府官報》視角下1910年至1919年 日本對朝鮮殖民統治初期政策硏究
동아인문학
2025 .03
-
‘統制經濟’와 ‘計劃經濟’의 교차와 길항 –1930년대 중국 統制經濟論의 개념화–
중국사연구
2020 .01
-
200년 사회적경제의 역사 속 한국의 사회적경제
공동체문화와 민속 연구
2022 .09
-
1930년대 중국의 統制經濟論과 근대 인식
중국근현대사연구
2018 .06
-
중일전쟁기 서남 大後方 경제건설과 法幣經濟圈
중국근현대사연구
2024 .12
-
16세기말 영남 관료 李庭檜의 인적 교류와 同官契의 실제
대동문화연구
2022 .06
-
李白과 李賀의 <將進酒>가 한국 한시에 끼친 영향에 관한 연구
국학연구론총
2015 .01
-
『我邦疆域考』 역주·비평 (2) －四郡總考･樂浪考－
한국사학보
2020 .05
-
고구려의 멸망에서 나당전쟁 발발로
중국고중세사연구
2017 .05
-
현대 일본의 시민사회와 ‘센카쿠제도’
일본문화연구
2022 .10
-
朝鮮後期 詠史樂府의 협운 활용 양상에 대하여
한국한문학연구
2015 .03
-
1930년대 초 남경정부의 금본위제 도입 시도와 그 의미
동양사학연구
2021 .06
-
“중국특색 세계사”의 현대사 인식과 서사 -‘마르크스주의공정세계사’(2020)를 중심으로-
중국근현대사연구
2024 .06
-
1931년 중국의 ‘복합재난’과 南京國民政府의 대응 -武漢 대수재를 중심으로-
인문학연구
2021 .01
-
16-17세기 세계경제의 등장과 그 성격 : 이론적 접근
역사와 세계
2015 .12
-
희년의 경제윤리 관점에서 본 남북한 경제협력
신학과 목회
2015 .05
-
中國 南京 秦淮河邊 출토 六朝時期 간독과 관련 문제
목간과문자
2018 .06
-
The Political Economy of South Korean Trade Growth and Social Change, 1963-2013
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
베이핑(北平)의 재정실태와 관광 진흥 논의 - 난징 국민정부 초기의 사회적 논의를 중심으로
홍영미
도시연구
2020
.11
남경국민정부 초기 ‘당화사법(黨化司法)’의 성립과 변천 - 약법(約法) 제정 문제를 중심으로 본 당치(黨治)의 이상과 현실 -
홍동의
기초법학연구
2022
.05
首都 · 舊都 · 故都: 南京國民政府 시기「舊都文物整理計劃」과 北平의 도시정체성 변화
홍영미
역사학보
2022
.03
남경국민정부시기 정치범 문제를 둘러싼 법률과 民權 논의 - 中國民權保障同盟의 성립과 활동을 중심으로 -
尹淑鉉
중국근현대사연구
2019
.06
南京國民政府時期 北平市公安局 政治訓練部의 성립과 변천
김택경
중국근현대사연구
2018
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-910-000211199