지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 24 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.37272/JIECR.2022.10.22.5.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Contact tracing applications are one of the most promising tools to slow the spread of coronavirus. Since being first documented in China, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected all aspects of society in serious and long-term ways. Tragically, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused more than six million deaths and even set back the progress of world economy by decades. In this study, we investigated the uptake of COVID-19 contact tracing applications in South Korea and China. In particular, drawing on agency theory, we examined the determinants of application use and compared the differences between these two countries. We also identified the moderating effects of privacy concerns and the mediating effects of implementation intention. We conducted a survey-based cross-country field study, and recruited undergraduate and graduate students from South Korea and China, separately. Results showed a large gap regarding the uptake of COVID-19 contact tracing applications between the two countries. In South Korea, self-regulation was the primary determinant, whereas government regulation was the primary factor in China. Our study contributes to the literature on both public health and information privacy, and more significantly, suggests how we can motivate more people to use such applications to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Literature Review
Ⅲ. Research Model and Hypotheses
Ⅳ. Research Methodology
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Analysis of Korea-China Trade Structure before and after COVID-19
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2023 .07
-
South Korea’s Soft Power in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic-An Analysis of the Expert Survey in Europe
Seoul Journal of Economics
2020 .01
-
Zero Covid Is Dead, Long Live Zero Covid: China’s Pandemic Approach Put to the Test
Global Asia
2022 .03
-
Interim Evaluation of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 and Preparation for a Post-COVID-19 World in Public Health
The Korean Journal of Policy Studies
2020 .01
-
South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 Using ICT
연구보고서
2020 .11
-
G-Zero: China and the US Fail the World over Covid-19
Global Asia
2020 .06
-
COVID-19 사태로 인한 장애근로자의 일자리 변화 탐색
벤처창업연구
2021 .10
-
COVID-19, Global Leadership, and the U.S.-China Relations
IFANS FOCUS
2020 .05
-
COVID19 스트레스가 중국 잠재관광객의 자연기반 야외활동 의사결정과정에 미치는 영향: 확장된 계획행동이론을 적용
관광레저연구
2021 .02
-
The Rise of China’s Digital Economy during the COVID-19 Crisis
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2021 .02
-
Tracing Asymmetries in China’s Growth
Global Asia
2021 .09
-
COVID19 변화, 대응, 그리고 그 이후
한국정신건강사회복지학회 학술발표논문집
2020 .08
-
Characteristics of Korea’s COVID-19 Response from the Standpoint of Democratic Governance
연구보고서
2020 .11
-
Collective Responses to COVID-19 of South Korea: An Introduction
The Korean Journal of Policy Studies
2020 .01
-
วิเคราะห์ระบบนโยบายสาธารณะต่อการตอบสนองการแพร่ระบาดของโรคติดเชื้อไวรัสโคโรนาสายพันธุ์ใหม่ 2019 ในประเทศไทย
한국태국학회논총
2023 .02
-
Components of Industry Resilience to Maintain Sustainable Economic Growth under COVID-19 Within the Knowledge-Based Economy Frame-work: A Comparative Study Between Iran and South Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .11
-
코로나19 확산에 따른 대학생 대상 국내외 정신건강 연구 리뷰
지역과 세계
2021 .09
-
Visualizing the Intellectual Structure of the Impact of COVID-19 on E-learning
인터넷전자상거래연구
2022 .04
-
COVID-19 확산의 이동성 효과 : TCS 데이터를 활용한 사회·경제적 효과 분석을 중심으로
e-비즈니스연구
2020 .10
-
COVID-19 and Global Value Chain
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0