메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
고은비 (성균관대) 서명원 백송민 손세형 (성균관대)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第40卷 第6號(通卷 第428號)
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
167 - 175 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to provide practical recommendations for improving the quality management of urban architectural design in South Korea. It does so by analyzing the UK"s structure for design quality management, focusing on the Design Quality Indicator (DQI). The analysis identified problems and root causes in South Korea"s current system and reviewed how the DQI was used at every stage in the UK"s architectural process, from planning through construction. This study also examined successful cases where the DQI had been implemented in the UK, deriving valuable insights to suggest improvements for South Korea"s approach to architectural design quality management. With growing international emphasis on enhancing urban and national image, several domestic policies and projects have been initiated. However, challenges remain, including inconsistent evaluation criteria, unclear guidelines, and a lack of post-construction assessments. To address these issues, this study explores the UK"s entire quality management system, including the Design Quality Indicator, and extracts relevant lessons for Korea. Based on this analysis, practical improvements were proposed for Korea"s urban architectural design quality management system. These recommendations included redefining concepts and policy objectives for urban architectural design, adjusting the scope of existing policies, and creating specialized guidelines and systems. The establishment of dedicated agencies for systematic management and operation was even advised. Additionally, it is crucial to design practical measures to motivate architects, who play a central role in shaping urban design quality.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 선행연구 고찰
3. 우리나라 도시·건축 디자인 품질관리시스템
4. 영국의 도시·건축 디자인 품질관리시스템
5. 시사점 및 소결
6. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089904801