메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Guang-Xun Lin (Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University) Li-Ru He (Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University) Jin-Niang Nan (Department of Clinical Medicine, Nanchang Medical College) Wen-Bin Xu (Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University) Keyi Xiao (Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University) Zhiqiang Que (Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University) Shang-Wun Jhang (Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital) Chien-Min Chen (Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital) Ming-Tao Zhu (Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University) Gang Rui (The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University)
저널정보
대한척추신경외과학회 Neurospine Neurospine Vol.21 No.1
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
261 - 272 (12page)
DOI
10.14245/ns.2347078.539

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages. Methods: A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications. Results: The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates. Conclusion: Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0