메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최상수 (충북대학교) 류화신 (충북대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 과학기술과 법 과학기술과 법 제15권 제1호
발행연도
2024.6
수록면
231 - 256 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The physician's duty of explanation is a procedure that requires a physician to explain the necessity and side effects of a medical procedure in detail before performing the medical procedure, and to allow the patient to choose whether or not to receive the medical procedure based on the patient's right to self-determination. Even minors are not only subjects of fundamental rights under the Constitution, but they are also capable of exercising their own rights as long as their decision-making capacity is recognized. In a recent Supreme Court ruling dated March 9, 2023, the court ruled that the obligation to explain medical treatment to an existing parent or legal representative can be fulfilled in a way that allows the medical treatment to be delivered to the minor through an ‘indirect explanation’ and that special circumstances must be examined in consideration of whether the minor has the decision-making capacity to understand and consent to the meaning of the medical treatment and the minor's active refusal. This means that even if a minor is a minor, he or she is the ultimate owner of his or her life, body, and health, and if he or she has the capacity to consent to medical treatment, the doctor is obligated to explain the medical treatment. However, it is difficult to clearly determine whether a minor has the capacity to consent to medical treatment, and there are special circumstances in which a doctor must explain and obtain consent directly from the minor. If a doctor is obligated to explain to a patient who is a minor with decision-making capacity, it should be the principle to explain directly to the patient, but before that, it seems necessary to establish the criteria for estimating the decision-making capacity of minors institutionally, and it is also necessary to consider whether direct explanation or interference is the best way to meet the welfare or best interests of the minor patient.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0