인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.8
- 수록면
- 315 - 347 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.24987/SNUACAR.2018.08.8.1.315
이용수
초록· 키워드
In recent years, online hate speech has gained considerable attention and some tech companies have attempted to regulate the behavior of internet users. One notable example is YouTube, the world’s most popular video sharing website, which enacted new policies in 2017 to censor content it considered racist or hateful. This paper examines how this situation played out for Japan-based YouTube content creators. It looks at the videos and the viewer communities surrounding two very popular right-wing YouTube channels: Nihon Bunka Channel Sakura and Black Pigeon Speaks.
Both Nihon Bunka Channel Sakura and Black Pigeon Speaks carefully tread the line between what is acceptable and unacceptable under YouTube’s rules, avoiding the use of language that could be considered outright hate speech. They also embraced online crowdfunding-which draws upon the contributions of individual viewers-as an alternative to relying on traditional advertising revenue. Amid the growth of private regulation that attempts to silence online hate speech and far right content creators, these two channels have built and maintained loyal communities of viewers, allowing them to survive and thrive. This raises questions about whether YouTube and other private internet companies can effectively regulate undesirable speech on their platforms.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Both Nihon Bunka Channel Sakura and Black Pigeon Speaks carefully tread the line between what is acceptable and unacceptable under YouTube’s rules, avoiding the use of language that could be considered outright hate speech. They also embraced online crowdfunding-which draws upon the contributions of individual viewers-as an alternative to relying on traditional advertising revenue. Amid the growth of private regulation that attempts to silence online hate speech and far right content creators, these two channels have built and maintained loyal communities of viewers, allowing them to survive and thrive. This raises questions about whether YouTube and other private internet companies can effectively regulate undesirable speech on their platforms.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- I. Introduction
- II. Private Regulation of Hate Speech & YouTube
- III. Hate Speech in Japan
- IV. The Growth of Private Censorship
- V. Channel Sakura
- VI. Content & Popularity: Channel Sakura
- VII. Channel Sakura’s Views on Hate Speech
- VIII. Channel Sakura’s Financial Survival
- IX. The Black Pigeon Speaks
- X. The Black Pigeon Speaks’ Views of Hate Speech
- XI. The Black Pigeon Speaks’ Financial Survival
- XII. Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-309-003326526
