인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyse the causes of sudden surge of credit defaulters during Kim Dae-Joong Administration after the IMP financial crisis. The focus of the study is twofold. One is an attempt to find the cause of the problem. The other is to examine the analytic foundations regarding how to resolve the issue of credit defaulters.
The dominant view has been that the increase of credit defaulters was due mainly to credit card overspending by respective individuals beyond their capability to repay. It also suggests that the problem be resolved at the individual level as each individuals are fully responsible for his/her own debt. By contrast, this paper points out the simplicity and irresponsibility of the dominant view in its causal explanation. Through an empirical analysis of in-depth interview survey of individual credit defaulters, this paper tries to show that the argument based on individual choice and moral responsibility lacks not only explaining power but also logical validity. The analysis also leads to the conclusion that an active role of government is essential in order for the problem of credit defaulters to be resolved.
Credit defaulters in Korea are deprived of their basic level of self-respect and civil rights that every human being should be able enjoy. It means that the problem of credit defaulters is not just an economic but social one inevitably intertwined with that of civil rights under democracy. In the final analysis, the issue of credit defaulters cannot be resolved if it is regarded as a problem only induced by the unhealthy way of individual overspending. Rather, it is crucial to note that it is a political, economic, and social issue that constitutes the characteristic of democracy in Korea.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지The dominant view has been that the increase of credit defaulters was due mainly to credit card overspending by respective individuals beyond their capability to repay. It also suggests that the problem be resolved at the individual level as each individuals are fully responsible for his/her own debt. By contrast, this paper points out the simplicity and irresponsibility of the dominant view in its causal explanation. Through an empirical analysis of in-depth interview survey of individual credit defaulters, this paper tries to show that the argument based on individual choice and moral responsibility lacks not only explaining power but also logical validity. The analysis also leads to the conclusion that an active role of government is essential in order for the problem of credit defaulters to be resolved.
Credit defaulters in Korea are deprived of their basic level of self-respect and civil rights that every human being should be able enjoy. It means that the problem of credit defaulters is not just an economic but social one inevitably intertwined with that of civil rights under democracy. In the final analysis, the issue of credit defaulters cannot be resolved if it is regarded as a problem only induced by the unhealthy way of individual overspending. Rather, it is crucial to note that it is a political, economic, and social issue that constitutes the characteristic of democracy in Korea.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 문제제기
- Ⅱ. 신용불량자의 미시적 기초 : 누가 신용불량자인가?
- Ⅲ. 신용불량 메커니즘 : 어떻게 신용불량자가 되나?
- Ⅳ. 정부의 대응과 신용불량자 문제의 사회적 결과
- Ⅴ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015194327
