인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
This studies the performance of the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone mineral density and lean body mass. This method was accurate in quantifying known amounts of lean body mass and bone mineral density. The subjects classified into intercollegiate gymnastics(19.26 years, career 10.5 years, n=15) and non-athlete group(20.07 years, n=7). On the basis of the results of lean body mass of each body region and bone mineral density were analyzed.
The results statistically analyzed on these data were summarized as follows;
1. Arms lean body mass showed a low correlation with arms bone mineral density. Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.51, p＜.05). Trunk lean body mass showed a low correlation with legs, Trunk bone mineral density. Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with Arms, Legs, Total bone mineral density(p＜.05) in control group.
2. Arms lean body mass showed a significant correlation with arms bone mineral density(r=0.64, p＜.05). Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.86, p＜.001). Trunk lean body mass showed a significant correlation with trunk bone mineral density(r=0.52, p＜.05). Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p＜.001). Arm lean body mass showed a significant with Legs, Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.65-0.88, p＜.001). Legs lean body mass showed a significant with Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p＜.001) in experimental group.
3. Lean body mass could be very important determinant of bone mineral density.
4. Lean body mass showed a high significant with bone mineral density by effect of training.
The results statistically analyzed on these data were summarized as follows;
1. Arms lean body mass showed a low correlation with arms bone mineral density. Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.51, p＜.05). Trunk lean body mass showed a low correlation with legs, Trunk bone mineral density. Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with Arms, Legs, Total bone mineral density(p＜.05) in control group.
2. Arms lean body mass showed a significant correlation with arms bone mineral density(r=0.64, p＜.05). Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.86, p＜.001). Trunk lean body mass showed a significant correlation with trunk bone mineral density(r=0.52, p＜.05). Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p＜.001). Arm lean body mass showed a significant with Legs, Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.65-0.88, p＜.001). Legs lean body mass showed a significant with Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p＜.001) in experimental group.
3. Lean body mass could be very important determinant of bone mineral density.
4. Lean body mass showed a high significant with bone mineral density by effect of training.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-016587736
