인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
磻溪 유형원의 대동법인식 : 조선후기 개혁론의 ‘두 가지 입장’대해서 Yu Hyŏngwŏn and the Taedong Law
피인용 0
磻溪 유형원의 대동법인식 : 조선후기 개혁론의 ‘두 가지 입장’대해서
초록·키워드
The two great wars against the Japanese and the Manchu in the late 1500s and the early 1600s led the Koreans to be involved in a series of debates aiming at the rejuvenation of the dynasty in trouble. Existing studies tend to understand that depending on their different socioeconomic bases, the debaters were divided into two different groups in terms of the goal and method of the reform. In particular, the tribute tax reform was the hottest issue and thus mentioned in detail by a number of scholars such as Yu Hy?ngw?n in provinces as well as officials in the central government. With emphasis on a new understanding of Yu's discourse on the tribute tax reform, this paper examines whether Yu's proposal was really a product of his socioeconomic situation which distinguished him from other reformers.
Most proposals for the tribute tax reform of the time took it for granted that the government should first estimate the amount of possible tax in-come and then make a budget: the principle of yangip wich'ul (量入爲出). To all the debaters, the Taedong Law was understood as the most possible plan for the realization of the adult male field system (ch?nj?nje 丁田制), the ideal land system in antiquity, as well as the principle per se. Although Yu seems to have not fully supported the Taedong reform, his point was not an opposition to the reform principle itself but a criticism of the reality in which the principle was compromised and even violated. Since the late 1500s, in short, the debaters and their proposals differed from each other in the extent of the application of the principle to the reality, not in the methodology of the application.
Most proposals for the tribute tax reform of the time took it for granted that the government should first estimate the amount of possible tax in-come and then make a budget: the principle of yangip wich'ul (量入爲出). To all the debaters, the Taedong Law was understood as the most possible plan for the realization of the adult male field system (ch?nj?nje 丁田制), the ideal land system in antiquity, as well as the principle per se. Although Yu seems to have not fully supported the Taedong reform, his point was not an opposition to the reform principle itself but a criticism of the reality in which the principle was compromised and even violated. Since the late 1500s, in short, the debaters and their proposals differed from each other in the extent of the application of the principle to the reality, not in the methodology of the application.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003607059
