인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
한국과 미국의 단체교섭법제 비교 : 교섭단위와 교섭대표제를 중심으로 A Comparative Study on the Legal System of Collective Bargaining in Korea and the U.S : Bargaining Unit and Bargaining Representatives
한국과 미국의 단체교섭법제 비교 : 교섭단위와 교섭대표제를 중심으로
초록·키워드
The laws of collective bargaining can be categorized according to the authorized entities in the bargaining relations. Firstly, there is a system which labor unions get the status of entity for their own union memberships. The system, namely, a labor union system is constructed in labor laws of Korea and Japan. Secondly, a bargaining representative system entitles employees’ representatives to the right of collective bargaining instead of labor unions. It covers the U.S and Canada.
Labor unions don’t need to get the representative status for collective bargaining separately in the labor union system. And the bargaining unit is not a decisive factor of the system differently from the system of bargaining representatives. But the labor union law of Korea has introduced the status of unions’ representative and the unit for collective bargaining under multi-unions conditions. The purpose is to force labor unions to choose their own representative for a single bargaining unit. The law has repealed the provisions including mandatory single union schemes but institutes the mandatory procedures of single unit in a workplace.
The mandatory procedures are different from the bargaining unit system in NLRA of the U.S. The bargaining unit is a group or jobs of employees for choosing employees’ representative by the employees. But the mandatory single unit is a business or a workplace of single employer, in which labor unions should choose a union representative to bargaining collectively with employer. The mandatory procedures of single unit have some contradictory facet to the labor union system embodied in labor law and the Constitution of Korea.
Labor unions don’t need to get the representative status for collective bargaining separately in the labor union system. And the bargaining unit is not a decisive factor of the system differently from the system of bargaining representatives. But the labor union law of Korea has introduced the status of unions’ representative and the unit for collective bargaining under multi-unions conditions. The purpose is to force labor unions to choose their own representative for a single bargaining unit. The law has repealed the provisions including mandatory single union schemes but institutes the mandatory procedures of single unit in a workplace.
The mandatory procedures are different from the bargaining unit system in NLRA of the U.S. The bargaining unit is a group or jobs of employees for choosing employees’ representative by the employees. But the mandatory single unit is a business or a workplace of single employer, in which labor unions should choose a union representative to bargaining collectively with employer. The mandatory procedures of single unit have some contradictory facet to the labor union system embodied in labor law and the Constitution of Korea.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-336-001237396