인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.2
- 수록면
- 213 - 254 (42page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
The Supreme Court of Korea handed down a decision on the liability of a mutual savings bank director regarding a project finance loan on October 13, 2011, the first decision of its kind in Korea. In this noteworthy decision, the Court remanded the part of the lower court decision, pointing out that the evaluation of the director, prior to the offer of the loan, on the feasibility of the real estate development project at issue was not thorough enough, even though the Court recognized that this case fell into the scope of a business judgment rule.
This decision is likely to serve as a significant reference point in the future director’s liability cases regarding a project finance loan. In this case, however, the appropriateness of the business judgment was at issue while no illegal acts of the director was found. Business judgment itself can be subject to judicial scrutiny, but only with prudence. Closely looking into the case with this principle in mind, it seems that the director’s liability could have been denied under the spirit of the business judgment rule. Therefore, the holding of the case should not be made leniently applicable to other cases of this kind so that the delicate balance between the spirit of enterpreneurism and the spirit of the rule of law can be achieved.
This decision is likely to serve as a significant reference point in the future director’s liability cases regarding a project finance loan. In this case, however, the appropriateness of the business judgment was at issue while no illegal acts of the director was found. Business judgment itself can be subject to judicial scrutiny, but only with prudence. Closely looking into the case with this principle in mind, it seems that the director’s liability could have been denied under the spirit of the business judgment rule. Therefore, the holding of the case should not be made leniently applicable to other cases of this kind so that the delicate balance between the spirit of enterpreneurism and the spirit of the rule of law can be achieved.
#프로젝트 파이낸스
#저축은행
#대출
#경영판단
#이사의 손해배상책임
#project finance
#bank
#loan
#director’s liability
#business judgment
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 사건과 판결의 내용
- Ⅲ. 쟁점 분석
- Ⅳ. 결론
- 〈참고문헌〉
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
