인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study was to consider the conditions that could live the consilience and result in developmental consilience in both sides of academic and practice in sports science from the viewpoint of the critical to existing studies of consilience in sports science. The main results of this study were as follow: First, must be necessary to discuss the consilience in sports science for improving the academical prestige of sports science in therms of academic and training the sport professional who have an ability to converge and so rise the social needs lately in terms of practice. Second, the basic conditions for developmental discussion about consilience in sports science were to close the distance between ‘two cultures’ that divided into the science and the humanities, to acknowledge and consider the various conditions for all kinds and forms of consilience as between disciplines in sports science, between sports science and the other disciplines, between fundamental and applied disciplines in sports science, and between theory and practice in sports science, and to solve the closure between disciplines in sports science and the absence of communication from that closure. Third, the practical tasks for the upcoming consilience in sports science were to collapse the boundaries between specialties in sports science, to reorganize the curriculum for cultivating men of talent who accustomed to consilience, and to collapse the boundaries between researchers in sports science for interchanging and mutual understanding between them.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-690-002667364