인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 109 (109page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
This study aims to analyze defamation and insult cases during the last ten years (2005-2015), and to investigate Korean courts’ standards for determining whether certain expressions or behaviors constitute defamations or insults. First, courts have been interpreting the concept of “publicity” of alleging facts or insults under Articles 307 (Defamation) and 311 (Insult) of Criminal Act, and Article 70 of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. to mean the state in which unspecified or many persons can know the facts or insults. The courts have been applying “the standard of a possibility of propagation” to determine the publicity of the alleged fact or insult and considering the relations between the accused, i.e. allegers, their listeners, and their victims. Second, courts have been ruling that a publication or expression of “facts” means a report or statement regarding facts of specific past or present in time and space, as opposed to, an opinion composed of a value judgment or evaluation, and that its contents must be provable by evidence. And the courts consider lay people’s understandings as one of the standards for the fact. Third, the falsity or veracity of a publicly alleged fact is determined by whether the significant parts of the fact correspond with the realty. Minor errors and slight exaggerations do not invalidate the veracity of the alleged facts. In judging the veracity, main and overall purposes of the statements or publications are an important factor to consider. Fourth, courts have defined “insults” as expressions of abstract judgements or contemptuous feelings which can degrade others’ social reputations. Alleged facts are not included in the category of insults under Article 311 of Criminal Act. And courts have admitted the possibility of defamation or insult to the name of group which is distributed to its each member. Fifth, conscious negligence with an awareness of the possibility of propagation and falsity is needed to constitute the crime of defamation and insult. In addition to conscious negligence, an intent to defame another is needed to constitute the crime of defamation through printed materials (Article 309 of Criminal Act) or cyber defamation (Article 70 of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.). Courts understand that there is adversarial relationship between the intent to defame another and the purpose to promote the public interest. Sixth, Article 310 of Criminal Act states “If the facts alleged under Article 307 (1) are true and solely for the public interest, the act shall not be punishable.” As to these factors that justify the act, whether the alleged facts have public concern and contribute to the formation of public opinions is considered significantly.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- [표지]
- [발간사]
- [목차]
- 표 차례
- [국문요약]
- [제1장 서론]
- 제1절 연구의 목적
- 제2절 연구의 내용 및 방법
- [제2장 명예훼손죄 관련 판례 분석]
- 제1절 개관
- 제2절 사실적시 명예훼손죄
- 제3절 사자 명예훼손죄
- 제4절 출판물에 의한 명예훼손죄
- 제5절 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률 제70조 위반죄(명예훼손죄)
- [제3장 모욕죄 관련 판례 분석]
- 제1절 개관
- 제2절 모욕죄 관련 판례 분석
- [제4장 결론]
- 1. 공연성
- 2. 사실적시
- 3. 허위사실적시
- 4. 모욕
- 5. 주관적 구성요건요소(고의, 비방목적)
- 6. 위법성조각사유
- [참고문헌]
- [판례색인]
- [Abstract]
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-364-002008662
