메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제83집
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    This study explores similarities and differences in the use of stance and engagement markers between Korean students’ English essays (KSEE) and New York Times opinion columns (NYTOC). For this comparison, 79 KSEE and 50 NYTOC were used to build up two corpora. Based on Hyland’s (2005a, 2008) metadiscourse model, they were statistically compared with the Mann- Whitney U test to investigate how writers use interactional sources of metadiscourse to convey their authorial voice and engage readers in their texts. Findings suggest that while KSEE used significantly more interactional markers on average, NYTOC adopted more diverse types of hedges, boosters, and attitude markers. In addition, they showed a marked disparity in the distribution of engagement markers. Pedagogical implications, such as training for textual voice construction and register -based instruction, are suggested.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기