인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The paper investigates whether teacher raters differentiating L1 nativeness affect their rating patterns in the English speaking assessment and, if so, what criteria cause the difference. More specifically, this study examines (1) the particular characteristics in setting up the criteria design between the two groups (native English teacher raters vs. non-native Korean English teacher raters), (2) the rating patterns of both groups’ actual assessment as the criteria application, and (3) test-takers’ response to the teacher raters’ evaluation of both groups. The results show that teacher raters of the two groups approach the criteria design and application differently in a subtle way, which results in different assessment patterns, and finally has an influence on the test-takers’ satisfaction levels. There are some similarities and differences between both groups. In the survey of the criteria design, both groups set up the topic performance and expression abilities as the most important constructs in the assessment, whereas the accuracy of grammar is considered less important. However, the two groups present different sets of opinions on interactions, expression ability, and relevant knowledge. In the survey for the test-takers, the respondents show no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, differences have been found in some constructs. Finally, the criteria design by the effect of raters’ L1 nativeness affect the raters’ application patterns, in which these characteristics cause various responses of the test-takers involved.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-740-001803405
