인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The aim of this study is to explain which life is more reasonable and hopeful through comparing the two characters’ contradicting life. Thomas Hardy tries to change and develop the tradition of Victorian society’s deep-seated male dominated circumstances and exclusive sense of value into the sexual equality and enlightened rural community through this novel. Eustacia, the heroin, hopes to escape the isolated and stony Egdon from start to finish. But the Nature rejects her desire. Because the Nature does not permit human beings’ treason to her. Clym, who returned to his native town Egdon to live for the rest of his life, has a plan to enlighten the rural people through education. Also his hope can not be fulfilled. The Nature does not accept Clym’s scheme because she herself rejects the change. Eustacia inevitably ends in death because her plan to escape the Nature turns into a daydream and fantasy. But Clym is rescued from death or catastrophe because he adjusted to the Nature’s principles. Eustacia expects Clym to come true her dream to escape the Egdon. Clym hopes to open a school to give knowledge to Egdon society with his wife. But their conceptions are not realistic and impractical because their notions and ambitions are not harmonious with the indifferent Egdon. In conclusion, Hardy tries to show us that Eustacia’s free will to exist must be accepted and the Clym’s lofty ideal must also be realized according to harmony with time and circumstances or the Nature.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
