인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Objectives: This study aimed to ascertain the feasibility of Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) for evaluating the quality of blood pressure management apps available in Korea. Methods: We searched blood pressure management apps in the Apple iTunes using “blood pressure” as the search term. Initially, 42 apps were found, of which 23 apps were included in the study. We translated Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) into Korean and used it as the assessment tool. Two authors used each of the 23 apps for at least 1 week and independently assessed each app using MARS. The final assessment scores were obtained from the consensus of the two reviewers. Results: Monitoring/tracking(91.3%) and goal setting(47.8%) were the most prevalent theoretical elements. Technical elements included reminder, sharing with facebook, etc, and log-in. The average quality scores for the four sections of engagement, functionality, aesthetic, and information were 2.4, 3.9, 3.1, 2.7, respectively. Five(21.7%) apps in engagement, 20(87.0%) apps in functionality, 12(52.2%) in aesthetic, and 7(30.4%) in information were desirable(>3.0). Conclusions: It was feasible to evaluate blood pressure management apps in Korea using MARS. Although the blood pressure management apps in Korea were found to be satisfactory in functionality, there was great room for improvement in engagement, aesthetic, and information. Moreover, the blood pressure management apps need to improve in the actual impacts on behavior change.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-517-003585565
