인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
This study aims to examine the distribution and uses of demonstratives, a major class of spatial deixis, in Korean, in comparison with English from a comparative perspective. We particularly explore whether the two languages are different with respect to a full inventory of semantico-pragmatic features influencing the selection of demonstratives and look further into whether there is any difference in the way even the same kinds of features are operative. Building on Imai (2003), we first suggest that physical distance and an addressee-oriented feature are commonly operative in demonstrative choice in both languages; departing from Imai, however, we argue that just as in English, psychological distance and [Equi-distance Contrast] should be included on the list of semantico-pragmatic features for Korean. Secondly, extending Niimura and Hayashi’s (1996) observation on Japanese and English, we claim that when physical and psychological distance conflict, the former determinant takes precedence over the latter in Korean whereas the hierarchical order is reversed in English. Finally, we show that the use of a pair of contrastive demonstratives is not always possible but restricted by a contextual condition: in short, the referents must be within the addressee’s physical territory in Korean (cf. Meira & Terrill (2005) for English). A consequence from our study is that it would not be sufficient just to provide a list of determining features for demonstratives.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-740-000790961
