인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Chinese EFL learners often make errors in their perception of English DOCs. Accordingly, in order to examine their perceptual patterns, we have conducted a survey on English and Chinese DOCs among 50 EFL learners in China. The subjects were given three tasks. First, they were asked to turn English DOCs into Chinese ones. It is shown that three ditransitive verbs, gei ‘give’ (100%), tou ‘steal’ (6%), and mai ‘buy’ (48%), vary in their accuracy rate, which we attribute to their different argument structure from those corresponding to them in English. Second, they were asked to put Chinese passives into English ones. It is shown that some of them omit the indispensable preposition to in English DO passive constructions, which is due to a cross-linguistic difference between English and Chinese passives in terms of Case assignment. Third, DO passivization in the verbs, tou ‘steal’ and mai ‘buy’, shows a remarkably higher frequency rate (92%) than IO passivization. This is due to negative transfer from the Chinese language, which highly prohibits Beneficiary IOs from occurring in passive subject position. The findings of this research work suggest some teaching implications in terms of Case and argument structure of English DOCs in comparison with Chinese.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-740-000790941
