인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The essay examines Alexander Pope’s “First Satire of the Second Book of Horace Imitated” as an apologia for his satire from the legal context. Pope uses Horace as his mentor, and tries to defend his satire as lawful poetry. Like Horace’s satire, Pope presents his poem as a dialog between him and his friend Fortescue about what poetry he should write. Being attacked by many people, Pope seeks legal advice from his friend. His friend advises rest, and sleep to take the mind off writing. He also advises Pope to write an encomium to the king, not satire. Pope, however, defends his satire as a social mirror in which he attacks the foibles of rogues. He insists that he should write satire, and punish rogues. Pope’s view about satire is close to the traditional principle of judicial punishment, namely deterrence, while literary satire is supposed to reform people. The lawyer responds by a warning to watch out for libel laws. Pope, however, insists that he should punish rogues like Walpole exempt from effective legal retribution. Then Pope’s satire becomes an honest quasi-judicial sanction to lash criminals escaping from laws. If laws fail to punish criminals properly, he has to punish them using satire.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
