메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(국사편찬위원회)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2022년 가을호(통권 제140호)
발행연도
수록면
69 - 110 (42page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2022.08.140.69

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

The deepening of inequality has made fairness and competence a hot topic instead of equality. Meritocracy appears in various forms under certain historical conditions. The effects and roles are bound to be different depending on the situation. Nevertheless, if the thickness of the time of meritocracy is measured, it is the largest in modern capitalism or capitalist modernity. The market for freedom, equality, and infinite competition created by the capitalist modern era is the best condition for meritocracy to flourish.
Meritocracy is not simply limited to abstract ideology. It is a value, a custom, and a series of institutional practices. In other words, meritocracy is systematically structured through education and operates as a principle of corporate management, and it spreads to the dominant value system and common sense through the public debate and permeates into everyday customs. Despite the categorical order of free and equal human beings, the social reproduction process naturally internalizes the hierarchy by ability.
The 1960s and 1970s are often referred to as the political and economic origins of modern Korea. This indicates that the width and depth of the change caused by capitalist industrialization were large. If the sense of material goods, equality and inequality, and ability that we are experiencing today is historically composed, it is clear that it cannot be irrelevant to the history of Korean capitalism. The task of asking what meritocracy developed in this era, commonly referred to as the “development era” is the key to understanding contemporary Korean society.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. 1. 머리말
  2. 2. 능력주의의 사회적 확산
  3. 3. 지능과 능력
  4. 4. 공론장의 능력주의와 비판 담론
  5. 5. 맺음말
  6. 참고문헌

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-905-001699361