인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 651 - 671 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.15531/KSCCR.2023.14.6.651
이용수
초록· 키워드
The South Korean government delineated carbon-neutral scenarios for the road transport sector in 2021, envisioning a more than 97% transition to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) by 2050. This study employs the Model for Energy Transition and Emission Reduction to examine changes in vehicle types, greenhouse gas emissions, and economic costs in the road transport sector until 2050. A comparison between the carbon-neutral (CN) and business-as-usual (BAU) scenarios, maintaining current policy levels, is conducted to derive policy implications. The attainment of carbon neutrality in the road transport sector hinges significantly on the widespread adoption of BEVs and FCEVs, with a crucial policy to ban the sales of internal combustion engine vehicle by the 2030s. A comparison of the two scenarios highlights the significant differences in the choice of BEVs and FCEVs between the non-business and business sectors. The direct costs, encompassing investment, operating, and fuel costs, are higher in the CN scenario than in the BAU scenario. However, when external costs related to greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle travel are factored in using carbon and vehicle miles traveled taxes, the total costs of the CN scenario are lower than those of the BAU scenario. Analyzing its economic viability by incorporating external costs enhances the policy’s feasibility of achieving carbon neutrality.
#2050 Carbon Neutrality
#Road transport Sector
#Scenario Analysis
#Battery Electric Vehicles
#Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
#Carbon Neutrality
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- ABSTRACT
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Literature review
- 3. Methods and data
- 4. Results
- 5. Policy implications
- 6. Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089314138